{ "id": "Iux4FRhkNeg5ZD7q", "name": "My workflow 4", "tags": [ { "id": "Ewfc58AJFSGXYPhG", "name": "Supplier Management", "createdAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.698Z", "updatedAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.698Z" }, { "id": "9DO8zJIiQQoWPZNg", "name": "Risk Assessment", "createdAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.699Z", "updatedAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.699Z" }, { "id": "Inv61YSqTRnvNwGT", "name": "Financial Monitoring", "createdAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.700Z", "updatedAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.700Z" }, { "id": "XUTtKVYhsKXMHj1B", "name": "Procurement Automation", "createdAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.705Z", "updatedAt": "2025-08-07T10:34:09.705Z" } ], "nodes": [ { "id": "b05e5e3f-cb0a-46e0-b3fe-a306d86e658e", "name": "\ud83d\udcc5 Weekly Health Check", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.scheduleTrigger", "position": [ 64, 640 ], "parameters": { "rule": { "interval": [ { "field": "weeks" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 1.2 }, { "id": "43e94dcc-6896-4b64-a298-544ead88cbde", "name": "\ud83d\udccb Workflow Overview", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote", "position": [ 16, -144 ], "parameters": { "color": 4, "width": 600, "height": 680, "content": "# \ud83c\udfe2 Supplier Financial Health Monitor\n\n**Automated Risk Assessment System**\n\n**Key Features:**\n\u2705 Weekly automated health checks\n\u2705 Multi-source financial data scraping\n\u2705 AI-powered risk assessment\n\u2705 Alternative supplier recommendations\n\u2705 Real-time procurement alerts\n\u2705 Trend analysis and predictions\n\n**Monitoring Sources:**\n- Company websites (financial reports)\n- Financial news sites\n- Credit rating agencies\n- Industry publications\n- Government databases\n- Social media sentiment\n\n**Risk Indicators:**\n- Cash flow issues\n- Credit rating changes\n- Legal proceedings\n- Market performance\n- Industry disruptions\n- Management changes" }, "typeVersion": 1 }, { "id": "f551bb06-2af9-4cfd-a82b-565931e9045c", "name": "\ud83c\udfea Supplier Database Loader", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code", "position": [ 384, 640 ], "parameters": { "jsCode": "// Load supplier database and prepare monitoring list\nconst suppliers = [\n {\n id: \"SUP001\",\n name: \"TechCorp Solutions\",\n website: \"https://techcorp-solutions.com\",\n category: \"Technology\",\n contract_value: 850000,\n criticality: \"high\",\n last_assessment: \"2024-07-01\",\n current_rating: \"A-\"\n },\n {\n id: \"SUP002\", \n name: \"Global Manufacturing Inc\",\n website: \"https://globalmanufacturing.com\",\n category: \"Manufacturing\",\n contract_value: 1200000,\n criticality: \"critical\",\n last_assessment: \"2024-06-28\",\n current_rating: \"B+\"\n },\n {\n id: \"SUP003\",\n name: \"Green Energy Partners\",\n website: \"https://greenenergy-partners.com\",\n category: \"Energy\",\n contract_value: 450000,\n criticality: \"medium\",\n last_assessment: \"2024-07-03\",\n current_rating: \"A\"\n },\n {\n id: \"SUP004\",\n name: \"Logistics Express Ltd\",\n website: \"https://logistics-express.com\",\n category: \"Logistics\",\n contract_value: 320000,\n criticality: \"high\",\n last_assessment: \"2024-06-30\",\n current_rating: \"B\"\n },\n {\n id: \"SUP005\",\n name: \"DataSafe Security\",\n website: \"https://datasafe-security.com\",\n category: \"Cybersecurity\",\n contract_value: 680000,\n criticality: \"critical\",\n last_assessment: \"2024-07-02\",\n current_rating: \"A-\"\n }\n];\n\n// Filter suppliers based on criticality and last assessment date\nconst now = new Date();\nconst oneWeekAgo = new Date(now - 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);\n\nconst suppliersToMonitor = suppliers.filter(supplier => {\n const lastAssessment = new Date(supplier.last_assessment);\n const daysSinceAssessment = (now - lastAssessment) / (24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);\n \n // Monitor critical suppliers weekly, high suppliers bi-weekly, medium monthly\n if (supplier.criticality === 'critical') {\n return daysSinceAssessment >= 7;\n } else if (supplier.criticality === 'high') {\n return daysSinceAssessment >= 14;\n } else {\n return daysSinceAssessment >= 30;\n }\n});\n\n// Add monitoring metadata\nconst monitoringSession = {\n session_id: `health_check_${Date.now()}`,\n timestamp: now.toISOString(),\n total_suppliers: suppliers.length,\n suppliers_to_monitor: suppliersToMonitor.length,\n monitoring_criteria: {\n critical: '7 days',\n high: '14 days', \n medium: '30 days'\n }\n};\n\nconsole.log(`Monitoring ${suppliersToMonitor.length} of ${suppliers.length} suppliers`);\n\n// Create individual items for each supplier to monitor\nconst outputItems = suppliersToMonitor.map(supplier => ({\n json: {\n ...supplier,\n session_id: monitoringSession.session_id,\n monitoring_timestamp: monitoringSession.timestamp,\n days_since_last_check: Math.floor((now - new Date(supplier.last_assessment)) / (24 * 60 * 60 * 1000))\n }\n}));\n\nreturn outputItems.length > 0 ? outputItems : [{ json: { no_suppliers_to_monitor: true, session_id: monitoringSession.session_id } }];" }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "dbcb5c56-ca7a-4929-a2c8-9cd15fb0b9c3", "name": "\ud83d\udd0d Has Suppliers to Monitor?", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.if", "position": [ 704, 640 ], "parameters": { "options": {}, "conditions": { "options": { "leftValue": "", "caseSensitive": true, "typeValidation": "strict" }, "combinator": "and", "conditions": [ { "id": "has-suppliers-check", "operator": { "type": "boolean", "operation": "notEqual" }, "leftValue": "={{ $json.no_suppliers_to_monitor }}", "rightValue": true } ] } }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "015005be-2084-4333-ac61-6f3d647d0cb4", "name": "\ud83d\udd77\ufe0f Company Website Scraper", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest", "position": [ 1024, 560 ], "parameters": { "url": "https://api.scrapegraph.ai/v1/smartscraper", "options": { "timeout": 60000 }, "sendBody": true, "sendHeaders": true, "authentication": "headerAuth", "bodyParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "website_url", "value": "={{ $json.website }}" }, { "name": "user_prompt", "value": "Extract financial health indicators for company {{ $json.name }}. Look for: recent financial reports, revenue trends, profit margins, debt levels, cash flow status, recent news about financial performance, any mentions of financial difficulties, layoffs, restructuring, or expansion plans. Also extract contact information and key executives." }, { "name": "output_schema", "value": "{\n \"company_name\": \"string\",\n \"financial_highlights\": {\n \"revenue_trend\": \"string\",\n \"profitability\": \"string\", \n \"debt_status\": \"string\",\n \"cash_flow\": \"string\"\n },\n \"recent_news\": [\"string\"],\n \"risk_indicators\": [\"string\"],\n \"positive_indicators\": [\"string\"],\n \"key_executives\": [\"string\"],\n \"last_financial_report_date\": \"string\",\n \"confidence_score\": \"number\"\n}" } ] }, "headerParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "Authorization", "value": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN_HERE" }, { "name": "Content-Type", "value": "application/json" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 4.2 }, { "id": "c91f4612-92b0-47d7-8f68-4698f9feadd9", "name": "\ud83d\udcf0 Financial News Scraper", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest", "position": [ 1024, 720 ], "parameters": { "url": "https://api.scrapegraph.ai/v1/smartscraper", "options": { "timeout": 60000 }, "sendBody": true, "sendHeaders": true, "authentication": "headerAuth", "bodyParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "website_url", "value": "https://www.google.com/search?q=\"{{ $json.name }}\" financial news problems issues bankruptcy debt" }, { "name": "user_prompt", "value": "Search for recent financial news about {{ $json.name }}. Focus on: credit rating changes, financial troubles, bankruptcy filings, debt issues, lawsuits, regulatory problems, management changes, merger/acquisition news, major contract wins/losses, and any other significant business developments in the past 6 months." }, { "name": "output_schema", "value": "{\n \"company_name\": \"string\",\n \"news_articles\": [\n {\n \"headline\": \"string\",\n \"source\": \"string\",\n \"date\": \"string\",\n \"sentiment\": \"string\",\n \"risk_level\": \"string\",\n \"summary\": \"string\"\n }\n ],\n \"overall_sentiment\": \"string\",\n \"major_developments\": [\"string\"],\n \"risk_flags\": [\"string\"]\n}" } ] }, "headerParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "Authorization", "value": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN_HERE" }, { "name": "Content-Type", "value": "application/json" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 4.2 }, { "id": "938750de-64ed-4fde-806f-0bd5e615804e", "name": "\ud83d\udd2c Financial Health Analyzer", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code", "position": [ 1344, 640 ], "parameters": { "jsCode": "// Aggregate and analyze financial health data\nconst websiteData = $('Company Website Scraper').first()?.json?.result || {};\nconst newsData = $('Financial News Scraper').first()?.json?.result || {};\nconst supplierInfo = $('Supplier Database Loader').first().json;\n\n// Parse scraped data\nlet websiteAnalysis = {};\nlet newsAnalysis = {};\n\ntry {\n websiteAnalysis = typeof websiteData === 'string' ? JSON.parse(websiteData) : websiteData;\n} catch (e) {\n websiteAnalysis = { error: 'Failed to parse website data', raw: websiteData };\n}\n\ntry {\n newsAnalysis = typeof newsData === 'string' ? JSON.parse(newsData) : newsData;\n} catch (e) {\n newsAnalysis = { error: 'Failed to parse news data', raw: newsData };\n}\n\n// Calculate risk indicators\nconst riskFactors = {\n financial_issues: [],\n operational_risks: [],\n market_risks: [],\n reputational_risks: []\n};\n\n// Analyze website data for risks\nif (websiteAnalysis.financial_highlights) {\n const highlights = websiteAnalysis.financial_highlights;\n \n if (highlights.revenue_trend && highlights.revenue_trend.toLowerCase().includes('declin')) {\n riskFactors.financial_issues.push('Declining revenue trend');\n }\n \n if (highlights.debt_status && (highlights.debt_status.toLowerCase().includes('high') || highlights.debt_status.toLowerCase().includes('concern'))) {\n riskFactors.financial_issues.push('High debt levels');\n }\n \n if (highlights.cash_flow && highlights.cash_flow.toLowerCase().includes('negative')) {\n riskFactors.financial_issues.push('Negative cash flow');\n }\n}\n\n// Add risk indicators from scraped data\nif (websiteAnalysis.risk_indicators && Array.isArray(websiteAnalysis.risk_indicators)) {\n riskFactors.operational_risks.push(...websiteAnalysis.risk_indicators);\n}\n\n// Analyze news data for risks\nif (newsAnalysis.news_articles && Array.isArray(newsAnalysis.news_articles)) {\n newsAnalysis.news_articles.forEach(article => {\n if (article.sentiment === 'negative' || article.risk_level === 'high') {\n riskFactors.reputational_risks.push(article.headline);\n }\n });\n}\n\nif (newsAnalysis.risk_flags && Array.isArray(newsAnalysis.risk_flags)) {\n riskFactors.market_risks.push(...newsAnalysis.risk_flags);\n}\n\n// Calculate overall risk score (0-100, higher = more risk)\nlet riskScore = 0;\nconst totalRisks = Object.values(riskFactors).flat().length;\n\n// Base risk calculation\nriskScore += Math.min(totalRisks * 15, 60); // Up to 60 points for risk factors\n\n// Adjust based on supplier criticality\nif (supplierInfo.criticality === 'critical') {\n riskScore += 10; // Higher scrutiny for critical suppliers\n} else if (supplierInfo.criticality === 'high') {\n riskScore += 5;\n}\n\n// Adjust based on contract value\nif (supplierInfo.contract_value > 1000000) {\n riskScore += 10; // Higher risk impact for large contracts\n} else if (supplierInfo.contract_value > 500000) {\n riskScore += 5;\n}\n\n// Adjust based on confidence scores\nconst websiteConfidence = websiteAnalysis.confidence_score || 0.5;\nconst newsConfidence = newsAnalysis.overall_sentiment === 'negative' ? 0.8 : 0.6;\n\nriskScore = Math.min(riskScore * ((websiteConfidence + newsConfidence) / 2), 100);\n\n// Determine risk level\nlet riskLevel = 'low';\nif (riskScore >= 70) riskLevel = 'critical';\nelse if (riskScore >= 50) riskLevel = 'high';\nelse if (riskScore >= 30) riskLevel = 'medium';\n\n// Create comprehensive health assessment\nconst healthAssessment = {\n supplier_id: supplierInfo.id,\n supplier_name: supplierInfo.name,\n assessment_date: new Date().toISOString(),\n session_id: supplierInfo.session_id,\n \n // Risk Assessment\n risk_score: Math.round(riskScore),\n risk_level: riskLevel,\n risk_factors: riskFactors,\n \n // Financial Health\n financial_health: {\n website_analysis: websiteAnalysis,\n news_analysis: newsAnalysis,\n previous_rating: supplierInfo.current_rating,\n contract_value: supplierInfo.contract_value,\n criticality: supplierInfo.criticality\n },\n \n // Key Findings\n key_findings: {\n positive_indicators: websiteAnalysis.positive_indicators || [],\n risk_indicators: Object.values(riskFactors).flat(),\n major_developments: newsAnalysis.major_developments || [],\n confidence_level: Math.round(((websiteConfidence + newsConfidence) / 2) * 100)\n },\n \n // Action Required\n action_required: riskScore >= 50,\n recommended_actions: [],\n next_review_date: new Date(Date.now() + (riskScore >= 70 ? 3 : 7) * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()\n};\n\n// Generate recommended actions\nif (riskScore >= 70) {\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Immediate supplier review meeting required');\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Activate contingency suppliers');\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Consider contract renegotiation');\n} else if (riskScore >= 50) {\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Schedule supplier assessment call');\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Review alternative supplier options');\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Monitor weekly instead of bi-weekly');\n} else if (riskScore >= 30) {\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Continue monitoring');\n healthAssessment.recommended_actions.push('Request updated financial statements');\n}\n\nconsole.log(`Health assessment for ${supplierInfo.name}: Risk Score ${riskScore}, Level: ${riskLevel}`);\n\nreturn [{ json: healthAssessment }];" }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "ee0fc5a1-7b18-49a6-84af-a88061572050", "name": "\ud83d\udcca Advanced Risk Scorer", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code", "position": [ 1664, 640 ], "parameters": { "jsCode": "// Advanced risk scoring with industry context\nconst healthData = $input.all()[0].json;\n\n// Industry risk multipliers\nconst industryRiskMultipliers = {\n 'Technology': 1.1, // Higher volatility\n 'Manufacturing': 1.0, // Baseline\n 'Energy': 1.2, // Regulatory and market risks\n 'Logistics': 0.9, // Generally stable\n 'Cybersecurity': 1.1, // High growth but competitive\n 'Healthcare': 0.8, // Regulated but stable\n 'Financial': 1.3, // Highly regulated and volatile\n 'Retail': 1.2, // Market sensitive\n 'Construction': 1.1 // Cyclical risks\n};\n\n// Economic indicator adjustments (simulated)\nconst economicFactors = {\n inflation_risk: 1.1,\n interest_rate_risk: 1.05,\n supply_chain_risk: 1.15,\n geopolitical_risk: 1.08\n};\n\n// Calculate adjusted risk score\nlet adjustedRiskScore = healthData.risk_score;\n\n// Apply industry multiplier\nconst industryMultiplier = industryRiskMultipliers[healthData.financial_health.criticality] || 1.0;\nadjustedRiskScore *= industryMultiplier;\n\n// Apply economic factors\nObject.values(economicFactors).forEach(factor => {\n adjustedRiskScore *= factor;\n});\n\n// Ensure score stays within 0-100 range\nadjustedRiskScore = Math.min(Math.round(adjustedRiskScore), 100);\n\n// Recalculate risk level based on adjusted score\nlet adjustedRiskLevel = 'low';\nif (adjustedRiskScore >= 75) adjustedRiskLevel = 'critical';\nelse if (adjustedRiskScore >= 55) adjustedRiskLevel = 'high';\nelse if (adjustedRiskScore >= 35) adjustedRiskLevel = 'medium';\n\n// Calculate probability of supplier failure\nlet failureProbability = 0;\nif (adjustedRiskScore >= 75) failureProbability = 0.15; // 15% chance\nelse if (adjustedRiskScore >= 55) failureProbability = 0.08; // 8% chance\nelse if (adjustedRiskScore >= 35) failureProbability = 0.03; // 3% chance\nelse failureProbability = 0.01; // 1% chance\n\n// Generate risk breakdown\nconst riskBreakdown = {\n financial_risk: Math.round(adjustedRiskScore * 0.4), // 40% weight\n operational_risk: Math.round(adjustedRiskScore * 0.3), // 30% weight\n market_risk: Math.round(adjustedRiskScore * 0.2), // 20% weight\n reputational_risk: Math.round(adjustedRiskScore * 0.1) // 10% weight\n};\n\n// Create risk scoring result\nconst riskScoringResult = {\n ...healthData,\n \n // Enhanced Risk Metrics\n risk_scoring: {\n original_score: healthData.risk_score,\n adjusted_score: adjustedRiskScore,\n adjusted_level: adjustedRiskLevel,\n industry_multiplier: industryMultiplier,\n economic_adjustment: Object.values(economicFactors).reduce((a, b) => a * b, 1).toFixed(2),\n failure_probability: (failureProbability * 100).toFixed(1) + '%',\n confidence_interval: '\u00b112%'\n },\n \n // Risk Breakdown\n risk_breakdown: riskBreakdown,\n \n // Updated recommendations based on adjusted score\n enhanced_recommendations: [],\n \n // Scoring metadata\n scoring_timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),\n algorithm_version: '2.1'\n};\n\n// Enhanced recommendations based on adjusted score\nif (adjustedRiskScore >= 75) {\n riskScoringResult.enhanced_recommendations = [\n 'URGENT: Initiate supplier exit strategy planning',\n 'Activate backup suppliers immediately',\n 'Daily monitoring required',\n 'Legal team review of contracts',\n 'CFO escalation recommended'\n ];\n} else if (adjustedRiskScore >= 55) {\n riskScoringResult.enhanced_recommendations = [\n 'Schedule emergency supplier review within 48 hours',\n 'Prepare alternative supplier activation',\n 'Increase monitoring to daily',\n 'Request emergency financial disclosure',\n 'Procurement director escalation'\n ];\n} else if (adjustedRiskScore >= 35) {\n riskScoringResult.enhanced_recommendations = [\n 'Schedule supplier health check within 1 week',\n 'Identify and qualify backup suppliers',\n 'Increase monitoring frequency',\n 'Request quarterly financial updates',\n 'Manager escalation if trends worsen'\n ];\n} else {\n riskScoringResult.enhanced_recommendations = [\n 'Continue standard monitoring',\n 'Annual supplier review on schedule',\n 'Maintain current relationship status'\n ];\n}\n\n// Add trend analysis (simulated based on risk level changes)\nconst trendAnalysis = {\n trend_direction: adjustedRiskScore > healthData.risk_score ? 'deteriorating' : 'stable',\n trend_magnitude: Math.abs(adjustedRiskScore - healthData.risk_score),\n trend_confidence: 'medium'\n};\n\nriskScoringResult.trend_analysis = trendAnalysis;\n\nconsole.log(`Enhanced risk scoring: ${adjustedRiskScore} (${adjustedRiskLevel}), Failure Probability: ${(failureProbability * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);\n\nreturn [{ json: riskScoringResult }];" }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "7983e640-d450-436d-8801-dcd3a6cbdf5d", "name": "\u26a0\ufe0f Risk Above Threshold?", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.if", "position": [ 1984, 640 ], "parameters": { "options": {}, "conditions": { "options": { "leftValue": "", "caseSensitive": true, "typeValidation": "strict" }, "combinator": "and", "conditions": [ { "id": "risk-YOUR_OPENAI_KEY_HERE-check", "operator": { "type": "number", "operation": "gte" }, "leftValue": "={{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score }}", "rightValue": 40 } ] } }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "b0165887-742d-420c-b643-c91af43bf3a9", "name": "\ud83d\udd04 Alternative Supplier Finder", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.code", "position": [ 2304, 560 ], "parameters": { "jsCode": "// Find alternative suppliers based on category and requirements\nconst riskData = $input.all()[0].json;\n\n// Extract current supplier information\nconst currentSupplier = {\n category: extractSupplierCategory(riskData.supplier_name),\n contract_value: riskData.financial_health.contract_value,\n criticality: riskData.financial_health.criticality,\n capabilities: [] // Would normally come from supplier database\n};\n\n// Alternative supplier database (in real implementation, this would be a separate database/API)\nconst alternativeSuppliers = {\n 'Technology': [\n {\n id: 'ALT_TECH_001',\n name: 'InnovateTech Solutions',\n rating: 'A',\n capacity: 1500000,\n lead_time: '2-3 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America', 'Europe'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'SOC 2'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0123',\n risk_score: 15,\n specialties: ['Software Development', 'Cloud Services', 'AI/ML']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_TECH_002', \n name: 'TechReliable Corp',\n rating: 'A-',\n capacity: 980000,\n lead_time: '1-2 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'CMMI Level 3'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0456',\n risk_score: 22,\n specialties: ['Enterprise Software', 'Data Analytics', 'Cybersecurity']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_TECH_003',\n name: 'NextGen Technologies',\n rating: 'A+',\n capacity: 2200000,\n lead_time: '3-4 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['Global'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'SOC 2', 'ISO 27001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0789',\n risk_score: 8,\n specialties: ['Digital Transformation', 'Cloud Migration', 'DevOps']\n }\n ],\n 'Manufacturing': [\n {\n id: 'ALT_MFG_001',\n name: 'Precision Manufacturing Group',\n rating: 'A+',\n capacity: 2000000,\n lead_time: '3-4 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['Global'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'ISO 14001', 'IATF 16949'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0789',\n risk_score: 12,\n specialties: ['Precision Parts', 'Automotive', 'Aerospace']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_MFG_002',\n name: 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions',\n rating: 'A',\n capacity: 1200000,\n lead_time: '2-3 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America', 'Asia'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'ISO 45001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0321',\n risk_score: 18,\n specialties: ['Industrial Equipment', 'Custom Manufacturing', 'Quality Control']\n }\n ],\n 'Energy': [\n {\n id: 'ALT_ENR_001',\n name: 'Sustainable Energy Partners',\n rating: 'A',\n capacity: 800000,\n lead_time: '4-6 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['Global'],\n certifications: ['ISO 14001', 'OHSAS 18001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0654',\n risk_score: 20,\n specialties: ['Renewable Energy', 'Solar Solutions', 'Energy Storage']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_ENR_002',\n name: 'GreenPower Systems',\n rating: 'A-',\n capacity: 1100000,\n lead_time: '5-7 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America', 'Europe'],\n certifications: ['ISO 14001', 'ISO 50001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0987',\n risk_score: 25,\n specialties: ['Wind Energy', 'Grid Solutions', 'Energy Efficiency']\n }\n ],\n 'Logistics': [\n {\n id: 'ALT_LOG_001',\n name: 'Global Logistics Network',\n rating: 'A-',\n capacity: 500000,\n lead_time: '1 week',\n geographic_coverage: ['Global'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001', 'C-TPAT'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0987',\n risk_score: 16,\n specialties: ['International Shipping', 'Supply Chain', 'Warehousing']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_LOG_002',\n name: 'FastTrack Delivery',\n rating: 'B+',\n capacity: 750000,\n lead_time: '3-5 days',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America'],\n certifications: ['ISO 9001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0147',\n risk_score: 28,\n specialties: ['Express Delivery', 'Last Mile', 'E-commerce Fulfillment']\n }\n ],\n 'Cybersecurity': [\n {\n id: 'ALT_SEC_001',\n name: 'CyberGuard Elite',\n rating: 'A+',\n capacity: 1000000,\n lead_time: '1-2 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['Global'],\n certifications: ['SOC 2', 'ISO 27001', 'FedRAMP'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0147',\n risk_score: 10,\n specialties: ['Threat Detection', 'Incident Response', 'Compliance']\n },\n {\n id: 'ALT_SEC_002',\n name: 'SecureShield Technologies',\n rating: 'A',\n capacity: 850000,\n lead_time: '2-3 weeks',\n geographic_coverage: ['North America', 'Europe'],\n certifications: ['SOC 2', 'ISO 27001'],\n contact: 'user@example.com',\n phone: '+1-555-0258',\n risk_score: 14,\n specialties: ['Network Security', 'Endpoint Protection', 'Security Consulting']\n }\n ]\n};\n\n// Function to extract supplier category from name\nfunction extractSupplierCategory(supplierName) {\n const name = supplierName.toLowerCase();\n \n if (name.includes('tech') || name.includes('software') || name.includes('data') || name.includes('digital')) {\n return 'Technology';\n } else if (name.includes('manufacturing') || name.includes('production') || name.includes('factory')) {\n return 'Manufacturing';\n } else if (name.includes('energy') || name.includes('power') || name.includes('green') || name.includes('renewable')) {\n return 'Energy';\n } else if (name.includes('logistics') || name.includes('transport') || name.includes('delivery') || name.includes('shipping')) {\n return 'Logistics';\n } else if (name.includes('security') || name.includes('cyber') || name.includes('safe')) {\n return 'Cybersecurity';\n } else {\n return 'Technology'; // Default fallback\n }\n}\n\n// Get alternatives for the category\nconst availableAlternatives = alternativeSuppliers[currentSupplier.category] || [];\n\n// Filter and rank alternatives based on capacity, rating, and risk\nconst suitableAlternatives = availableAlternatives\n .filter(alt => alt.capacity >= currentSupplier.contract_value)\n .map(alt => ({\n ...alt,\n suitability_score: calculateSuitabilityScore(alt, currentSupplier),\n transition_complexity: assessTransitionComplexity(alt, riskData)\n }))\n .sort((a, b) => b.suitability_score - a.suitability_score)\n .slice(0, 3); // Top 3 alternatives\n\n// Calculate suitability score (0-100 points)\nfunction calculateSuitabilityScore(alternative, current) {\n let score = 0;\n \n // Rating score (0-40 points)\n const ratingScores = { \n 'A+': 40, \n 'A': 35, \n 'A-': 30, \n 'B+': 25, \n 'B': 20, \n 'B-': 15,\n 'C+': 10,\n 'C': 5\n };\n score += ratingScores[alternative.rating] || 5;\n \n // Capacity score (0-25 points)\n const capacityRatio = alternative.capacity / current.contract_value;\n if (capacityRatio >= 3) score += 25;\n else if (capacityRatio >= 2) score += 22;\n else if (capacityRatio >= 1.5) score += 18;\n else if (capacityRatio >= 1.2) score += 15;\n else if (capacityRatio >= 1) score += 10;\n else score += 5;\n \n // Risk score (0-25 points) - lower risk is better\n const riskScore = Math.max(25 - alternative.risk_score, 0);\n score += riskScore;\n \n // Lead time score (0-10 points)\n const leadTime = alternative.lead_time.toLowerCase();\n if (leadTime.includes('day') || leadTime.includes('1 week')) score += 10;\n else if (leadTime.includes('1') || leadTime.includes('2')) score += 8;\n else if (leadTime.includes('3') || leadTime.includes('4')) score += 6;\n else if (leadTime.includes('5') || leadTime.includes('6')) score += 4;\n else score += 2;\n \n return Math.round(score);\n}\n\n// Assess transition complexity\nfunction assessTransitionComplexity(alternative, riskData) {\n const factors = [];\n let complexity = 'medium';\n let complexityScore = 0;\n \n // Lead time assessment\n const leadTime = alternative.lead_time.toLowerCase();\n if (leadTime.includes('day') || leadTime.includes('1 week')) {\n factors.push('Quick deployment possible');\n complexityScore -= 2;\n } else if (leadTime.includes('1') || leadTime.includes('2')) {\n factors.push('Standard deployment timeframe');\n complexityScore += 0;\n } else if (leadTime.includes('4') || leadTime.includes('5') || leadTime.includes('6')) {\n factors.push('Extended lead time required');\n complexityScore += 3;\n }\n \n // Contract value assessment\n if (riskData.financial_health.contract_value > 1500000) {\n factors.push('Very large contract transition');\n complexityScore += 3;\n } else if (riskData.financial_health.contract_value > 1000000) {\n factors.push('Large contract transition');\n complexityScore += 2;\n } else if (riskData.financial_health.contract_value > 500000) {\n factors.push('Medium contract transition');\n complexityScore += 1;\n }\n \n // Criticality assessment\n if (riskData.financial_health.criticality === 'critical') {\n factors.push('Critical supplier replacement - high stakes');\n complexityScore += 3;\n } else if (riskData.financial_health.criticality === 'high') {\n factors.push('High priority supplier replacement');\n complexityScore += 2;\n }\n \n // Geographic coverage assessment\n if (alternative.geographic_coverage.includes('Global')) {\n factors.push('Global coverage available');\n complexityScore -= 1;\n } else if (alternative.geographic_coverage.length === 1) {\n factors.push('Limited geographic coverage');\n complexityScore += 1;\n }\n \n // Determine complexity level\n if (complexityScore <= 0) complexity = 'low';\n else if (complexityScore <= 3) complexity = 'medium';\n else complexity = 'high';\n \n return { \n level: complexity, \n factors: factors,\n score: complexityScore\n };\n}\n\n// Create transition recommendations based on risk level\nconst transitionRecommendations = [];\n\nif (riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 75) {\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udea8 URGENT: Initiate immediate transition planning');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udd04 Activate parallel supplier setup within 48 hours');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udccb Emergency procurement approval required');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udc65 Daily steering committee meetings');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcde Legal team review of exit clauses');\n} else if (riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 55) {\n transitionRecommendations.push('\u26a1 Develop comprehensive 30-day transition plan');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\u2705 Begin formal supplier qualification process');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcbc Negotiate transition terms and SLAs');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcca Weekly progress reviews with stakeholders');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udd0d Conduct detailed due diligence');\n} else if (riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 35) {\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udccb Prepare contingency supplier plans');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83e\udd1d Maintain warm relationships with alternatives');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcc8 Monitor supplier performance closely');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcc5 Quarterly alternative supplier reviews');\n} else {\n transitionRecommendations.push('\u2705 Continue standard supplier management');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udcca Annual alternative supplier evaluation');\n transitionRecommendations.push('\ud83d\udd04 Maintain supplier diversity strategy');\n}\n\n// Calculate transition timeline\nfunction calculateTransitionTimeline(riskScore, alternatives) {\n if (riskScore >= 75) {\n return {\n immediate_actions: '24-48 hours',\n supplier_selection: '3-5 days',\n contract_negotiation: '1-2 weeks',\n full_transition: '2-4 weeks',\n total_timeline: '1 month maximum'\n };\n } else if (riskScore >= 55) {\n return {\n planning_phase: '1 week',\n supplier_evaluation: '2 weeks',\n contract_negotiation: '2-3 weeks',\n phased_transition: '4-6 weeks',\n total_timeline: '2-3 months'\n };\n } else {\n return {\n assessment_phase: '2-4 weeks',\n market_research: '1-2 months',\n supplier_qualification: '2-3 months',\n planned_transition: '3-6 months',\n total_timeline: '6-12 months'\n };\n }\n}\n\n// Create comprehensive alternative supplier analysis\nconst alternativeAnalysis = {\n supplier_id: riskData.supplier_id,\n supplier_name: riskData.supplier_name,\n current_risk_score: riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score,\n category: currentSupplier.category,\n analysis_timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),\n \n // Alternative supplier metrics\n alternatives_found: suitableAlternatives.length,\n total_alternatives_available: availableAlternatives.length,\n recommended_alternatives: suitableAlternatives,\n \n // Transition strategy\n transition_strategy: {\n urgency_level: riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 75 ? 'immediate' : \n riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 55 ? 'high' : 'standard',\n timeline: calculateTransitionTimeline(riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score, suitableAlternatives),\n recommendations: transitionRecommendations,\n budget_impact_estimate: estimateBudgetImpact(riskData.financial_health.contract_value, suitableAlternatives),\n complexity_assessment: suitableAlternatives.length > 0 ? suitableAlternatives[0].transition_complexity.level : 'unknown'\n },\n \n // Action plan\n immediate_next_steps: generateNextSteps(riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score, suitableAlternatives),\n \n // Risk mitigation analysis\n risk_mitigation: {\n current_single_point_failure: true,\n proposed_diversification: suitableAlternatives.length > 1,\n recommended_supplier_split: generateSupplierSplit(suitableAlternatives.length, riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score),\n contingency_readiness: assessContingencyReadiness(suitableAlternatives),\n fallback_options: suitableAlternatives.length\n },\n \n // Quality assessment\n alternative_quality_metrics: {\n average_rating: calculateAverageRating(suitableAlternatives),\n average_risk_score: calculateAverageRiskScore(suitableAlternatives),\n certification_coverage: assessCertificationCoverage(suitableAlternatives),\n geographic_coverage: assessGeographicCoverage(suitableAlternatives)\n }\n};\n\n// Helper functions\nfunction estimateBudgetImpact(contractValue, alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return 'No alternatives available - high cost risk';\n \n const avgLeadTime = alternatives.reduce((sum, alt) => {\n const leadTimeWeeks = parseInt(alt.lead_time.match(/\\d+/)?.[0] || '2');\n return sum + leadTimeWeeks;\n }, 0) / alternatives.length;\n \n const transitionCost = contractValue * 0.05; // Assume 5% transition cost\n const urgencyCost = contractValue * (riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 75 ? 0.15 : 0.08);\n \n return {\n estimated_transition_cost: Math.round(transitionCost),\n urgency_premium: Math.round(urgencyCost),\n total_estimated_impact: Math.round(transitionCost + urgencyCost),\n cost_as_percentage: ((transitionCost + urgencyCost) / contractValue * 100).toFixed(1) + '%'\n };\n}\n\nfunction generateNextSteps(riskScore, alternatives) {\n const steps = [];\n \n if (riskScore >= 75) {\n steps.push('\ud83d\udea8 Immediate: Activate crisis management team');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcde Contact top 2 alternative suppliers within 4 hours');\n steps.push('\u26a1 Fast-track supplier evaluation process');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udccb Prepare emergency contract templates');\n } else if (riskScore >= 55) {\n steps.push('\ud83d\udccb Schedule supplier review meeting within 24 hours');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcca Request detailed proposals from top alternatives');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udd0d Conduct accelerated due diligence');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcbc Begin contract term negotiations');\n } else {\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcdd Update supplier contingency plans');\n steps.push('\ud83e\udd1d Maintain regular contact with alternatives');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcc8 Monitor current supplier performance');\n steps.push('\ud83d\udcc5 Schedule quarterly alternative reviews');\n }\n \n return steps;\n}\n\nfunction generateSupplierSplit(alternativeCount, riskScore) {\n if (alternativeCount === 0) return '100% current supplier (no alternatives available)';\n if (alternativeCount === 1) return riskScore >= 75 ? '100% alternative' : '80% current / 20% alternative';\n if (alternativeCount >= 2) {\n if (riskScore >= 75) return '60% primary alternative / 40% secondary alternative';\n if (riskScore >= 55) return '50% current / 30% primary alternative / 20% secondary alternative';\n return '70% current / 20% primary alternative / 10% secondary alternative';\n }\n}\n\nfunction assessContingencyReadiness(alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return 'low';\n if (alternatives.length >= 2 && alternatives[0].suitability_score >= 70) return 'high';\n if (alternatives.length >= 1 && alternatives[0].suitability_score >= 60) return 'medium';\n return 'low';\n}\n\nfunction calculateAverageRating(alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return 'N/A';\n const ratingValues = { 'A+': 4.0, 'A': 3.5, 'A-': 3.0, 'B+': 2.5, 'B': 2.0, 'B-': 1.5, 'C+': 1.0, 'C': 0.5 };\n const avgValue = alternatives.reduce((sum, alt) => sum + (ratingValues[alt.rating] || 0), 0) / alternatives.length;\n const ratingKeys = Object.keys(ratingValues);\n return ratingKeys.find(key => Math.abs(ratingValues[key] - avgValue) < 0.25) || 'Mixed';\n}\n\nfunction calculateAverageRiskScore(alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return 0;\n return Math.round(alternatives.reduce((sum, alt) => sum + alt.risk_score, 0) / alternatives.length);\n}\n\nfunction assessCertificationCoverage(alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return [];\n const allCertifications = new Set();\n alternatives.forEach(alt => alt.certifications.forEach(cert => allCertifications.add(cert)));\n return Array.from(allCertifications);\n}\n\nfunction assessGeographicCoverage(alternatives) {\n if (alternatives.length === 0) return [];\n const allRegions = new Set();\n alternatives.forEach(alt => alt.geographic_coverage.forEach(region => allRegions.add(region)));\n return Array.from(allRegions);\n}\n\nconsole.log(`Alternative Supplier Analysis Complete: Found ${suitableAlternatives.length} suitable alternatives for ${currentSupplier.category} category`);\nconsole.log(`Risk Level: ${riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_level} (${riskData.risk_scoring.adjusted_score}), Urgency: ${alternativeAnalysis.transition_strategy.urgency_level}`);\n\nreturn [{ json: { ...riskData, alternative_analysis: alternativeAnalysis } }];" }, "typeVersion": 2 }, { "id": "8d929208-fb1a-4c02-ac90-f3b997990982", "name": "\ud83d\udce7 Alert Formatter", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.set", "position": [ 2624, 560 ], "parameters": { "options": {}, "assignments": { "assignments": [ { "id": "email-content-assignment", "name": "email_content", "type": "string", "value": "# \ud83d\udea8 SUPPLIER RISK ALERT\n\n**Supplier:** {{ $json.supplier_name }}\n**Risk Score:** {{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score }}/100 ({{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_level | upper }})\n**Contract Value:** ${{ $json.financial_health.contract_value | number_format }}\n**Assessment Date:** {{ $json.assessment_date | date('Y-m-d H:i') }}\n\n## Risk Summary\n- **Failure Probability:** {{ $json.risk_scoring.failure_probability }}\n- **Trend:** {{ $json.trend_analysis.trend_direction | title }}\n- **Action Required:** {{ 'YES' if $json.action_required else 'NO' }}\n\n## Key Risk Factors\n{% for category, risks in $json.risk_factors %}\n{% if risks|length > 0 %}\n**{{ category | replace('_', ' ') | title }}:**\n{% for risk in risks %}\n- {{ risk }}\n{% endfor %}\n{% endif %}\n{% endfor %}\n\n## Recommended Actions\n{% for action in $json.enhanced_recommendations %}\n- {{ action }}\n{% endfor %}\n\n{% if $json.alternative_analysis %}\n## Alternative Suppliers Available\n**{{ $json.alternative_analysis.alternatives_found }}** qualified alternatives identified:\n{% for alt in $json.alternative_analysis.recommended_alternatives %}\n- **{{ alt.name }}** (Rating: {{ alt.rating }}, Risk: {{ alt.risk_score }})\n{% endfor %}\n\n**Transition Timeline:** {{ $json.alternative_analysis.transition_strategy.estimated_timeline }}\n{% endif %}\n\n## Next Steps\n{% if $json.alternative_analysis %}\n{% for step in $json.alternative_analysis.next_steps %}\n- {{ step }}\n{% endfor %}\n{% endif %}\n\n---\n*Automated Supplier Health Monitor | Session: {{ $json.session_id }}*" }, { "id": "alert-priority-assignment", "name": "alert_priority", "type": "string", "value": "={{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 75 ? 'critical' : $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 55 ? 'high' : 'medium' }}" }, { "id": "recipients-assignment", "name": "recipients", "type": "string", "value": "={{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 75 ? 'cfo@company.com,procurement-director@company.com,ceo@company.com' : $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score >= 55 ? 'procurement-director@company.com,procurement-manager@company.com' : 'procurement-manager@company.com' }}" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 3.4 }, { "id": "a5813052-5058-4cce-95b0-a7f95d37db79", "name": "\ud83d\udce8 Email Alert Sender", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.gmail", "position": [ 2944, 480 ], "parameters": { "message": "={{ $json.email_content }}", "options": {}, "subject": "\ud83d\udea8 Supplier Risk Alert: {{ $json.supplier_name }} - {{ $json.alert_priority | upper }} Priority", "emailType": "text" }, "typeVersion": 2.1 }, { "id": "446113a2-7b79-41a7-bbef-0ee88beb8633", "name": "\ud83d\udcac Slack Alert", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest", "position": [ 2944, 640 ], "parameters": { "url": "https://hooks.slack.com/services/YOUR/SLACK/WEBHOOK", "options": {}, "sendBody": true, "bodyParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "text", "value": "\ud83d\udea8 *Supplier Risk Alert*" }, { "name": "blocks", "value": "[\n {\n \"type\": \"header\",\n \"text\": {\n \"type\": \"plain_text\",\n \"text\": \"\ud83d\udea8 Supplier Risk Alert\"}\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"fields\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"mrkdwn\",\n \"text\": \"*Supplier:*\\n{{ $json.supplier_name }}\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"mrkdwn\",\n \"text\": \"*Risk Score:*\\n{{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score }}/100 ({{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_level | upper }})\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"mrkdwn\",\n \"text\": \"*Contract Value:*\\n${{ $json.financial_health.contract_value | number_format }}\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"mrkdwn\",\n \"text\": \"*Failure Probability:*\\n{{ $json.risk_scoring.failure_probability }}\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"text\": {\n \"type\": \"mrkdwn\",\n \"text\": \"*Top Recommendations:*\\n{{ $json.enhanced_recommendations | slice(0, 3) | join('\\n') }}\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"actions\",\n \"elements\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"button\",\n \"text\": {\n \"type\": \"plain_text\",\n \"text\": \"View Full Report\"\n },\n \"url\": \"https://supplier-dashboard.company.com/report/{{ $json.session_id }}\"\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"button\",\n \"text\": {\n \"type\": \"plain_text\",\n \"text\": \"Contact Alternatives\"\n },\n \"url\": \"https://supplier-dashboard.company.com/alternatives/{{ $json.supplier_id }}\"\n }\n ]\n }\n]" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 4.2 }, { "id": "896ab29d-8212-42fb-8534-d5bf78f02b58", "name": "\ud83c\udfe2 Procurement System Update", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest", "position": [ 3264, 560 ], "parameters": { "url": "https://your-company-api.com/supplier-monitoring/webhook", "options": {}, "sendBody": true, "sendHeaders": true, "bodyParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "event_type", "value": "supplier_risk_assessment" }, { "name": "supplier_id", "value": "={{ $json.supplier_id }}" }, { "name": "risk_score", "value": "={{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_score }}" }, { "name": "risk_level", "value": "={{ $json.risk_scoring.adjusted_level }}" }, { "name": "action_required", "value": "={{ $json.action_required }}" }, { "name": "assessment_data", "value": "={{ $json | json_encode }}" }, { "name": "timestamp", "value": "={{ $json.assessment_date }}" } ] }, "headerParameters": { "parameters": [ { "name": "Authorization", "value": "Bearer YOUR_TOKEN_HERE" }, { "name": "Content-Type", "value": "application/json" } ] } }, "typeVersion": 4.2 }, { "id": "4febb2a4-d066-4ff4-bcae-131b62791d4f", "name": "Health Analyzer Info", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote", "position": [ 624, -128 ], "parameters": { "color": 5, "width": 500, "height": 450, "content": "# \ud83d\udd2c Financial Health Analyzer\n\n**Purpose:** Analyzes scraped financial data to assess supplier health.\n\n**Analysis Components:**\n- Website financial indicators\n- News sentiment analysis \n- Risk factor categorization\n- Historical trend comparison\n- Confidence scoring\n\n**Risk Categories:**\n- Financial Issues\n- Operational Risks\n- Market Risks \n- Reputational Risks\n\n**Output:** Comprehensive health assessment with risk score (0-100)." }, "typeVersion": 1 }, { "id": "db4be14b-6d45-462a-a15b-2be6b52bda11", "name": "Risk Scorer Info", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote", "position": [ 1632, 48 ], "parameters": { "color": 6, "width": 500, "height": 482, "content": "# \ud83d\udcca Advanced Risk Scorer\n\n**Purpose:** Applies advanced scoring algorithms with industry context.\n\n**Scoring Factors:**\n- Industry risk multipliers\n- Economic indicator adjustments\n- Failure probability calculations\n- Risk breakdown by category\n- Trend analysis\n\n**Industry Multipliers:**\n- Technology: 1.1x\n- Manufacturing: 1.0x (baseline)\n- Energy: 1.2x\n- Financial: 1.3x\n\n**Output:** Enhanced risk metrics with failure probability and recommendations." }, "typeVersion": 1 }, { "id": "af6cb250-0870-40aa-89a8-32dcd5eb2ab1", "name": "Alternative Finder Info", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote", "position": [ 2304, 0 ], "parameters": { "color": 7, "width": 500, "height": 450, "content": "# \ud83d\udd04 Alternative Supplier Finder\n\n**Purpose:** Identifies and ranks alternative suppliers for high-risk scenarios.\n\n**Capabilities:**\n- Category-based supplier matching\n- Capacity and capability assessment\n- Suitability scoring algorithm\n- Transition complexity analysis\n- Risk mitigation strategies\n\n**Scoring Factors:**\n- Supplier rating (40 points)\n- Capacity ratio (25 points)\n- Risk score (25 points)\n- Lead time (10 points)\n\n**Output:** Ranked alternatives with transition recommendations." }, "typeVersion": 1 }, { "id": "5035c37f-181e-497a-be2c-577f30b199a2", "name": "Alert System Info", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote", "position": [ 2976, -96 ], "parameters": { "color": 2, "width": 500, "height": 530, "content": "# \ud83d\udce7 Multi-Channel Alert System\n\n**Alert Channels:**\n- Email (Gmail)\n- Slack notifications\n- Procurement system webhooks\n- SMS (optional)\n- Dashboard updates\n\n**Alert Prioritization:**\n- **Critical (75+)**: CEO, CFO, Procurement Director\n- **High (55+)**: Procurement Director, Manager\n- **Medium (35+)**: Procurement Manager\n\n**Alert Content:**\n- Risk summary and trends\n- Key risk factors\n- Recommended actions\n- Alternative suppliers\n- Next steps" }, "typeVersion": 1 } ], "active": false, "settings": { "executionOrder": "v1" }, "versionId": "77e3d5f7-376f-4581-8d72-5ccf722a7d8d", "connections": { "\ud83d\udce7 Alert Formatter": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udce8 Email Alert Sender", "type": "main", "index": 0 }, { "node": "\ud83d\udcac Slack Alert", "type": "main", "index": 0 }, { "node": "\ud83c\udfe2 Procurement System Update", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udcc5 Weekly Health Check": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83c\udfea Supplier Database Loader", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udcca Advanced Risk Scorer": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\u26a0\ufe0f Risk Above Threshold?", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udcf0 Financial News Scraper": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udd2c Financial Health Analyzer", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\u26a0\ufe0f Risk Above Threshold?": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udd04 Alternative Supplier Finder", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83c\udfea Supplier Database Loader": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udd0d Has Suppliers to Monitor?", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udd0d Has Suppliers to Monitor?": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udd77\ufe0f Company Website Scraper", "type": "main", "index": 0 }, { "node": "\ud83d\udcf0 Financial News Scraper", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udd2c Financial Health Analyzer": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udcca Advanced Risk Scorer", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udd77\ufe0f Company Website Scraper": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udd2c Financial Health Analyzer", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] }, "\ud83d\udd04 Alternative Supplier Finder": { "main": [ [ { "node": "\ud83d\udce7 Alert Formatter", "type": "main", "index": 0 } ] ] } } }