This workflow follows the Chainllm → Form Trigger recipe pattern — see all workflows that pair these two integrations.
The workflow JSON
Copy or download the full n8n JSON below. Paste it into a new n8n workflow, add your credentials, activate. Full import guide →
{
"name": "Content - Write Best Tools In Category Article",
"nodes": [
{
"parameters": {
"formTitle": "Best Tools In Category",
"formFields": {
"values": [
{
"fieldLabel": "Category Slug",
"placeholder": "ai-marketing-tools",
"requiredField": true
},
{
"fieldLabel": "Audience",
"placeholder": "Job seekers, employees, and recruiters",
"requiredField": true
},
{
"fieldLabel": "Tool Slugs To Include",
"placeholder": "Optional list comma-separated list of tool slugs to include"
}
]
},
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.formTrigger",
"typeVersion": 2.2,
"position": [
-400,
0
],
"id": "6305efa2-3b34-408a-aa99-7715375ad067",
"name": "form_trigger"
},
{
"parameters": {
"content": "## Construct Deep Research Prompt",
"height": 620,
"width": 2080
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote",
"position": [
-200,
-240
],
"typeVersion": 1,
"id": "e1310f6e-d4c8-4219-80d9-621482a15c67",
"name": "Sticky Note"
},
{
"parameters": {
"url": "=https://api.aitools.inc/categories/{{ $json['Category Slug'] }}",
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest",
"typeVersion": 4.2,
"position": [
-120,
0
],
"id": "c6e40603-d8af-414e-9354-bd6508aeaa46",
"name": "fetch_category"
},
{
"parameters": {
"url": "=https://q0fo807q.api.sanity.io/v2025-04-03/data/query/production?query=*%5B_type+%3D%3D+%22tool%22+%26%26+%24categorySlug+in+categories%5B%5D+-%3E+slug.current%5D+%7B%0A++_id%2C%0A++title%2C%0A++%22slug%22%3A+slug.current%2C%0A++%22websiteUrl%22%3A+tool_urls.website_url%2C%0A++meta_description%0A%7D&%24categorySlug=%22{{ $json.slug.current }}%22&perspective=published",
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest",
"typeVersion": 4.2,
"position": [
100,
0
],
"id": "d430aae2-19c8-418b-b320-f0e0c0972a6f",
"name": "fetch_category_tools"
},
{
"parameters": {
"assignments": {
"assignments": [
{
"id": "9481198d-c856-410a-b852-8adfa96794e6",
"name": "category_tools",
"value": "={{ $json.result }}",
"type": "array"
}
]
},
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.set",
"typeVersion": 3.4,
"position": [
340,
0
],
"id": "60894da4-5d49-4631-80df-47e18d9e228c",
"name": "set_category_tools"
},
{
"parameters": {
"assignments": {
"assignments": [
{
"id": "3eebc0cf-6950-4b6a-bbf0-a1b8584aa1dc",
"name": "deep_research_prompt",
"value": "=## **Task Instructions**\n\nYour task is to research the provided {{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} and prepare a report to the exact specification detailed below. Tools included in this report must be part of the provided list and you must output your report exactly as the instructions state. Think carefully and deeply about all of these requirements.\n\n1. You have been provided with JSON in the `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON` section (included in this prompt) that contains a JSON array of AI tools relevant to the category \u201c{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }}\u201d. You are ONLY allowed to use these tools in your research and in your final output selection of top tools. Keep this in mind throughout the entire research process. You must make note of this in your research plan to confirm you understand. Sometimes this category may be very broad with a lot of tools, if that is the case you should use your best judgement in order to filter down this list to the tools that truly are {{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} and are best for the target audince.\n - **JSON Structure**: Each item in the JSON array will include the following fields for each tool: `_id` (unique tool identifier), `title` (tool name), `slug`, `websiteUrl`, and `meta_description`. Read and parse this list of tools carefully to understand the entire scope of tools you will be researching.\n\n2. **Count the Total Number of Tools and List out each tool**\n - Read and parse the tools in the `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON` section (included in this prompt and wrapped in backticks to indicate it is code), and count the total number of tool items in the JSON array. Before starting your research, you must confirm the tool items you have counted with me. I am expecting you to see *{{ $node[\"fetch_category_tools\"].json.result.length }}* tools here that you will consider for your research and analysis.\n - List out each tool provided in the `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON` section that you plan to research and consider for picking the best tools. Please include the tool name and website url for the tool. You should use this as a reference to help guide your research for possible tools to include in your final output. It is critical that you only research these tools.\n - In your message, you must include both the total count of tools and the list of every tool to evaluate.\n\n3. **Research Best {{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} (Primary Research Task)**\n - Investigate **only** the tools that appear in the `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON` section. Do not consider tools outside this provided JSON array of tools. THIS IS CRITICAL, YOU MUST ONLY CONSIDER THE TOOLS PROVIDED IN THE JSON ARRAY BELOW. DO NOT INCLUDE A TOOL IN YOUR TOP 6-8 TOOLS OUTPUT UNLESS IT IS IN THE JSON ARRAY PROVIDED.\n - Look for information on popularity, features, community sentiment, pros/cons, and notable use cases. Use reliable sources such as:\n - User discussions on Reddit, Stack Overflow, Hacker News.\n - Product review platforms (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, TrustPilot).\n - Official websites and reputable professional blogs.\n - **Timeframe**: Focus on reviews, discussions, and updates within the last 12\u201318 months to ensure the information is recent and relevant.\n\n{{\n $('form_trigger').item.json['Tool Slugs To Include']\n ? \"4. Your MUST include these tools in your research and include each of them in your final output for the best 6-8 selected tools. We have already done some initial research on these tools and know they are part of the best tools we want to feature. The values below are the slugs of the tools in our system. You should match these slugs against the full list of tools listed in the provided JSON section to get more details about the tools.:\\n\" + $('form_trigger').item.json['Tool Slugs To Include'].split(\",\").map(tool => \"\\t- \" + tool.trim()).join(\"\\n\")\n : \"\\n\"\n}}\n\nYou must pay close attention to these details and include them in your research plan. It is extremely important that you understand this and follow through on these instructions. Use all text here I am providing you as your research plan verbatim. If you miss any details on your research plan will mean a failure for this task. Make sure there is no placeholder text or example text that leaks into the research plan.\n\nUSE EVERYTHING THAT I AM GIVING YOU HERE IN YOUR RESEARCH PLAN. DO NOT REMOVE ANY DETAILS. THIS WILL BE CONSIDERED A FAILED TASK IF YOU REMOVE ANY DETAILS.\n\n### **Evaluation Criteria**\n\n1. **Popularity & Adoption**: Which tools receive consistent, positive mentions or recommendations in online communities?\n2. **Features & Capabilities**: Identify standout functionalities, unique features, or advanced options relevant to this category.\n3. **User Feedback & Satisfaction**: Note key praises and complaints from credible user reviews and comments.\n4. **Recent Activity & Support**: Prioritize tools that show regular updates, active support communities, and well-maintained documentation.\n5. **Suitability for Different Use Cases**: Determine which tools serve specific audiences best (startups vs. enterprises, certain industries, etc.).\n \n**Ranking Guidance**:\n- **Emphasize Proven User Feedback Over Marketing**: Give more weight to legitimate, repeatedly positive reviews from real users and active communities than to promotional claims. \n- **Verify Legitimacy**: Ensure the praise or criticism comes from genuine user experiences rather than biased or marketing-driven sources. \n- **Highlight Repeated Insights**: Look for recurring themes in feedback\u2014when multiple users mention a specific strength (e.g., ease of use, reliability) or weakness (e.g., bugs, poor support), that pattern should significantly influence the ranking. \n- **Consider Community and Developer Support**: Tools with large and active communities, frequent updates, and responsive support often offer a more robust user experience. Use the degree of ongoing engagement as a key factor in your assessment.\n- **Avoid Low Quality Sources**: You should avoid using unknown websites as sources in your evaluation process. You should avoid using low-authority websites as sources in your evaluation process. Evaluations must exclusively use information from authoritative, credible, and reputable sources OR from real user reviews and feeback left on each tool.\n\n### **Handling Conflicting or Limited Data**\n\n- If you find **conflicting opinions**, attempt to explain the reasons behind the divergence (e.g., different use cases or technical expertise).\n- If a tool has **limited information** online, explicitly note this, as it may indicate lower adoption or visibility.\n\n### **Output Format**\n\nPay close attention to this output format and each section that is detailed here. This details exactly what information needs to be included on the research report output and how it should be organized. Your output should include everything shared here.\n\n1. **Condensed Top 6\u20138 Table**\n - Provide a concise ranked table of the **best 6\u20138 tools**. Don't feel like you just return 8 tools if there are not 8 very strong tools. It is completely your decision on the number of tools to pick in that range as long as they are high quality and should be considered in the \"best\" tools list. If you are struggling to pick out high quality tools, you are encouraged to choose a number of tools that makes more sense. Think deeply about this decision on number of tools to include. Before making your final selection, please review the task requirements that detail that each tool pikced here MUST be from the provided JSON array of tools. You may ONLY consider tools on the provided list. Your final output must contain AT LEAST 6 tools.\n - Use the following columns (or an equivalent format):\n 1. **Rank** #1 being the best overall tool. Think carefully and deeply one which tools are best and should appear at the top of this list.\n 2. **Tool Name**\n 3. **Tool Id**: You must reference the `Tool Id Extraction` section for instructions on how to output the correct id here. This is extremely important. You must correctly extract this tool id value and follow the given guidelines. You are not allowed to make a mistake here so think carefully and output the correctly matched tool id. On your output, please output the text \"Tool Id: \" followed the tool id value that was matched.\n 4. **\u201cBest For\u201d One-Line Description** (e.g., \u201cBest for small data teams,\u201d \u201cBest for real-time analytics,\u201d etc.). These MUST be unique across each tool. The Best for description may NOT be duplicated across tools.\n2. **Expanded Tool Profiles/Reviews**\n - For each tool in your top 6\u20138 tools:\n - Generate an **In-Depth Profile for each of the top 6-8 leading tools** within the specified category: `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }}`. The analysis must provide deep, actionable insights suitable for informing evaluation and potential adoption/purchase decisions. **Core Requirement: Strategic Essence & Differentiation Analysis** Move beyond surface-level descriptions and feature lists your research and output should cover:\n 1. **Core Value Proposition & Strategic Positioning:** What fundamental problem does this tool solve, and for whom? What is its unique place or reputation in the market? What is it truly **known for**?\n 2. **Key Differentiators & Competitive Edge:** What makes this tool genuinely **unique** compared to its peers? Identify specific features, methodologies, or approaches that give it an edge.\n 3. **Areas of Excellence & Optimal Use Cases:** Where does this tool demonstrably **excel**? What specific tasks or workflows does it handle exceptionally well? What unique capabilities does it **enable** for its users?\n 4. **Ideal User Profile:** Describe the primary users or organizations that gain the most value from this tool (e.g., specific roles, team sizes, industries, levels of expertise).\n Present the analysis for each tool as a concise profile (aim for approximately 2 well-developed paragraphs).\n 5. **Start Directly with Insights:** Immediately address the strategic elements above. **Do not** begin with a generic statement defining the tool category (e.g., \"Tool X is a [Category] tool...\"). Assume the reader understands the basic category.\n 6. **Integrate Functionality Contextually:** Mention core functions only as necessary to illustrate points about differentiation, excellence, or enablement, not as a standalone list.\n 7. **Reference Examples:** The provided examples illustrate the required **minimum standard** for depth, insight, and strategic value. Your analysis must achieve this level.\n 8. **Focus:** Prioritize revealing the underlying strategic advantages, target audience fit, and unique capabilities over merely summarizing marketing points or basic features.\n 9. **Requirement:** Delivering this level of deep, non-obvious, and strategically valuable insight is critical for success on this task.\n - **Tool Id**: You must reference the `Tool Id Extraction` section for instructions on how to output the correct id here. This is extremely important. You are not allowed to make a mistake here so think carefully and output the correctly matched tool id.\n - **Key Features**: Highlight standout functions or advanced capabilities. You should provide descriptions here of the standout and key features. We want to know more about what make the feature useful or helpful to users. Expand on multiple features if they exist. Please provide a full paragraph of 3-4 sentences FOR EACH FEATURE explaining context like what the feature is, why it benefits users, and its benefits.\n - **Pros & Cons**: Common praises and criticisms from recent user discussions/reviews. Detailed breakdowns of pros and cons will be helpful here. Please provide multiple bullets for each pro and con. Please expand around the context of each pro and con. Please provide a full pargraph of 3-4 sentences FOR EACH PRO AND CON that you list here. You must reference specific findings that gives more context around each pro and con. Additional context and specifics must be provided on your output.\n - **Best For**: Specify use cases, industries, or team sizes where the tool is particularly effective. Please include details and why this \"best for\" was selected. Looking for a full paragraph (3-4 sentences) expanding on this.\n - **References (preferred)**: Provide URLs or mention the forums/discussions where you found significant insights.\n - If exact links are not available, give the site/platform name and approximate date or any identifying details.\n3. **Honorable Mentions**\n - If any tools **outside** the top 6\u20138 frequently appear in your research or show strong potential for niche uses, include them in a short \u201cHonorable Mentions\u201d section. Briefly note why they didn\u2019t make the main list (e.g., limited data, narrower feature set).\n4. **Brief Summary**\n - Conclude with a concise comparison of your top picks, emphasizing **why** they stand out over others in the JSON.\n - Highlight any overarching industry trends, repeated user comments, or critical factors (e.g., pricing, community size) that influenced your final ranking.\n\nEach key feature you list must be followed by a paragraph of 3 to 4 sentences of supporting text that adds more context to the feature, what it does, who its for, and its benefits. It is best that you include specific details here. You should aim to identify at least 4 features for each tool.\n\nEach pro you list must be followed by a paragraph of 3 to 4 sentences of supporting text that adds more to the pro just listed. This should reference specific insights or context found in your research. It is best that you include specific details here. You should aim to identify at least 3 pros for each tool. Keep true to the sources you find the pros on. Your output should contain specifics that match what people are saying about the tools and what they find most valuable. Don't summarize these pros, we want you to output the details of exactly what people think.\n\nEach con you list must be followed by a paragraph of 3 to 4 sentences of supporting text that adds more to the pro just listed. This should reference specific insights or context found in your research. It is best that you include specific details here. You should aim to identify at least 4 cons for each tool. Keep true to the sources you find the cons on. Your output should contain specifics that match what people are saying about the tools and what they find most painful, annoying, etc. Don't summarize these cons, we want you to output the details of exactly what people think.\n\nYour output here should be verbose and provide specific deatils and context. We are looking to really to the root of why each tool was selected and better understand the strengths and weaknesses of each tool. Point to specific details that will help best utilize this research when we create content based around it. Having the most important details and insights here is critical to your task. More detail and specific context is always better.\n\n### **Tone & Style**\n\n- Maintain a **professional but approachable** tone.\n- Provide **factual**, **transparent** explanations and source attributions (especially for user-driven insights).\n- Avoid outdated or unverified claims; emphasize consistency across multiple reputable sources.\n- If quoting users or community posts, **anonymize** or paraphrase the content to protect privacy.\n\n## Target Audience\n\n- Creators, marketers, developers, and business owners looking for cutting-edge AI solutions.\n- They are technically curious individuals wanting to keep up with next-gen AI trends.\n\n## Additional Research Instructions **IMPORTANT**\n\n1. You **MUST NOT** use or reference any content from \"aitools.inc\" as a source of information. \n - Under **no circumstances** should you cite or link to \"aitools.inc\".\n - You **cannot** summarize, quote, or otherwise incorporate information from \"aitools.inc\".\n2. Ensure that any references you provide are:\n - From the last 12\u201318 months (for relevancy).\n - Appropriately attributed with either direct URLs or well-known platform names (e.g., \u201cA Reddit thread from August 2024...\u201d).\n3. Do not, under any circumstances, break these instructions. If you are ever unsure, **err on the side of excluding** the content from \"aitools.inc\".\n4. You **MUST** limit the tools you include on your research report to tools provided in the JSON array/list of tools below in the `{{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON` section. You may NOT output tools in the top 6-8 tools selection unless they are included in the provided list of tools. Think through this carefully before constructing your output.\n5. You **MUST** carefully read through each of the examples provided for tool research output and make sure the research you put together matches the same level of detail and insights.\n\nYou should perform your research using queries that include **-site:aitools.inc** in the search string. This ensures that no data from that source is retrieved or synthesized. This means \"site:aitools.inc\" WILL NOT be used in web searches for your research.\n\nBy following these instructions, we will maintain compliance with the requirement to exclude \u201caitools.inc\u201d as a source.\n\n### **Actionable Next Steps**\n\n- Whenever possible, include quick suggestions on how a reader could **get started** with each tool (e.g., free trials, GitHub links, official demos).\n- This ensures the final list not only compares the best tools but also guides the user on practical next steps.\n- There's no need to include physical locaion in here since these are all digital products and platforms.\n\n## Tool Id Extraction\n\n**Important**: Each tool in the JSON has a **unique `_id` field**. When listing any tool id/identifier (in a table, review, or reference), you **must** do the following:\n\n1. **No Numeric Placeholders or Substitutions** \n - For every tool, whenever you reference its Tool Id, you **must** copy and paste the exact `_id` from the JSON. \n - You cannot replace or modify any characters in the `_id`\u2014no truncation, no quote changes, no additional spaces, no reformatting.\n\n2. **Distinguish 'Rank' and 'Tool Id'** \n - Include a separate column for \u201cRank\u201d (e.g., #1, #2, #3\u2026) to show ordering. \n - In a distinct \u201cTool Id\u201d column, **only** provide the original `_id` from the JSON verbatim.\n\n3. **Example of Correct Table Columns** \n - **Rank**: #1, #2, etc. \n - **Tool Name**: e.g., \"Synthesia\" \n - **Tool Id**: the exact `_id` value from the JSON, like `3Hx6vANMj3Gv9uQA81MDCl` (not a placeholder).\n - **Best For**: the 'best for' phrase determined for this tool\n\n4. **No Guessing** \n - If you are ever unsure about an `_id`, leave it out rather than guess or fabricate a numeric or placeholder id.\n\n**Example of Correct vs. Incorrect Usage** \n- **Correct**: \n `Tool Id: 3Hx6vANMj3Gv9uQA81MDCl` \n- **Incorrect** (missing or edited characters, placeholders, or different punctuation): \n `Tool Id: 3Hx6vANMj3Gv9uQA81MDCL (example)` \n `Tool Id: 3Hx6vANMj3GV9uQA81MDCl`\n\nYou must extract and include the correct tool idea on your report. This is NOT the slug of the tool, it is the `_id` field.\n\nUse this example as an additional reference. On this single tool item json, the correct tool id value to extract and ouput will be `OV3o2t7M68aAVZSgHcO2oS` since it is the value of the `_id` field on the object / element.\n\nIt is critical that you match and extract the correct identifier value here. If you get this wrong, the entire task will be considered a failure. Please review this carefully, think for several minutes on how to approach this, and do perform this matching and tool id extraction process correctly.\n\n```\n{\n \"meta_description\": \"Create professional videos with AI avatars and voiceovers using quickvideo.ai. Explore how to simplify video production for your business needs.\",\n \"_id\": \"OV3o2t7M68aAVZSgHcO2oS\",\n \"title\": \"quickvideo.ai\",\n \"slug\": \"quickvideo-ai\",\n \"websiteUrl\": \"https://quickvideo.ai/\"\n}\n```\n\n**Action Required** \n- When providing your ranked table and expanded reviews, always list the tool\u2019s `_id` exactly as shown in our JSON. \n- Any tool that you do **not** include in the top 6\u20138 ranking should not appear in the final table. Do not fabricate IDs for them.\n\n**Why This Matters**\nOur database relies on these precise `_id` values to map your recommendations back to the correct tools. **Even a single missing or altered character** can break this connection.\n\n---\n\n**Final Goal**: Deliver a well-researched, **ranked** shortlist (5\u20138 tools) with clear justifications. The final output should empower me to quickly decide which tools to explore further based on recent community sentiment, feature sets, and suitability for my specific needs. All output must be in English.\n\nPlease chose an appropriate number in the range of 6-8 tools to include. I trust your judgement on picking a number of tools that makes the most sense to feature on a blog post.\n\n---\n## Tool Research Output Examples (IMPORTANT)\n\nHere are examples of the quality level of deep research output require for this task. You must look below the surface level details for each tool and gain a true understanding of what makes this tool good, what its features are, who primarly uses it, how it stands out, what unique features it has, and other details that would be valuable to someone looking to make a purchase decision for this tools. This level of detail and depth is REQUIRED for this research task to be successful.\n\nYou must spend 3 hours reading each of these examples and then reflect on why this output is good. After doing that, you may being your research and apply what makes these examples so good to the output of your own research.\n\nYOU MUST BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE SAME LEVEL OF DETAIL AND UNIQUE INSIGHTS FOR EACH TOOL ON YOUR RESEARCH REPORT. IF YOU CANNOT DO THIS, YOUR OUPUT ON THIS TASK WILL BE CONSIDERED A FAILURE.\n\n### Tool Research Output Example #1\n\nHere is an example from great text content output from a tool called \"Instantly\". I want you to read through this output example deeply, think on it for 3 hours about what makes it great, and apply this to your research process and output. Your research output MUST match the quality and detail level of this example.\n\nThis example does a very good job of finding useful details abou the tool that are deeper than surface-level and expanding on key functionality/features, value proposition of the tool, and what it excels at. This output really does a great job researching \"Instantly\" in-depth and sharing the details.\n\n```\nOverview: Instantly has rapidly become a go-to tool for cold email outreach, especially among startups and agencies in the past 1\u20132 years\u200b\nSALESFORGE.AI\n. It\u2019s an email prospecting platform known for its ability to send campaigns from multiple email accounts while also warming those accounts to maintain deliverability. Instantly doesn\u2019t provide prospect lists; rather, it maximizes the impact of your email outreach with automation and inbox management powered by AI. Its tagline might as well be \u201csend more emails that land in the inbox.\u201d With Instantly, you can connect unlimited email accounts, automate follow-ups, track replies, and use AI for basic email text variations \u2013 all with an emphasis on hitting the primary inbox and not spam. Key Features:\nUnlimited Email Accounts & Warm-up: Instantly allows users to connect many sender accounts (Gmail, Outlook, etc.) and automatically runs warm-up sequences on them. This improves sender reputation so that your cold emails are more likely to be delivered. Many competitors cap the number of inboxes or charge per inbox; Instantly\u2019s flat pricing for unlimited accounts has been a big draw\u200b\nG2.COM\n.\nAutomated Sequences & Follow-ups: You can set up multi-step email sequences (e.g., initial outreach, then a bump email 3 days later) easily. Instantly handles sending follow-ups in the same thread if desired. It also offers scheduling and throttling to mimic human sending patterns.\nAI Copy Suggestions: While not as advanced as some others, Instantly has introduced AI features like an \u201cAI Email Writer\u201d to help craft or improve your message content (e.g., rephrase a sentence to be more concise or adjust tone). This is handy for users who aren\u2019t sure how to write outreach emails, though it\u2019s more of a helper than a fully autonomous writer.\nAnalytics & Email Health Insights: Instantly provides dashboards for open, reply, bounce rates, and even an email \u201cHealth\u201d monitor that checks each account\u2019s deliverability status. It will alert you if an account is at risk (e.g., too many bounces or spam flags) so you can pause or adjust. This focus on deliverability sets it apart.\nTeam Collaboration: It supports team workflows \u2013 you can manage multiple client campaigns (great for agencies) and share templates or results across team members.\nPros: Excellent deliverability and ease of use are the top praises. Many users report that Instantly helped them land in inboxes reliably and scale up outreach. On G2, it\u2019s one of the highest-rated in its category (4.8/5 with over 3,600 reviews) and users highlight its intuitive interface and strong customer support\u200b\nG2.COM\n\u200b\nG2.COM\n. A Reddit user in r/coldemail mentioned \u201cI\u2019ve been using Instantly for all my cold email campaigns, and it\u2019s been great so far\u201d (late 2023). Another thread noted high deliverability and the time-saving nature of managing many inboxes in one place\u200b\nREPLY.IO\n. In short, Instantly is loved for letting even a small team run big email campaigns without much technical headache. Support is described as very responsive and helpful\u200b\nG2.COM\n, which is crucial when dealing with email issues. It\u2019s also quite affordable relative to the volume you can send \u2013 there is even a free plan and the paid plans (~$30-$80/mo range) allow unlimited sending accounts\u200b\nINSTANTLY.AI\n, which is a huge value for heavy senders. Cons: The feature set is focused mostly on email \u2013 it doesn\u2019t natively do LinkedIn or phone, etc., so it\u2019s not a multi-channel tool (unlike some others). A few users have reported bugs or tracking issues; for example, one Reddit user complained that Instantly said emails were sent but they didn\u2019t see them in the outbox, raising concerns about reporting accuracy\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Another user was \u201cvery disappointed\u201d after some success, citing that a lot of their emails might not actually be getting delivered despite what the app says\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. These anecdotes suggest that while many find deliverability great, some have hit snags \u2013 possibly due to sending tactics or technical hiccups. Email content personalization is limited \u2013 you can use mail-merge fields, but Instantly\u2019s AI isn\u2019t as advanced in crafting unique first lines about a prospect (you\u2019d use it alongside a tool like Quicklines or do manual research for that). Also, a small number of users mention billing frustrations (e.g., misunderstanding the free trial or being charged when forgetting to cancel) \u2013 always double-check the terms. Overall, however, concrete cons are relatively few; Instantly is a specialized tool and it does that specialty well, with most \u201cdislikes\u201d being feature requests (e.g., better team roles, more CRM integrations)\u200b\nG2.COM\n\u200b\nG2.COM\n. Best Fit Use Cases: Cold email at scale is Instantly\u2019s bread and butter. It\u2019s ideal for startups, agencies, or SDR teams that have their own lead lists and need to reach out to hundreds or thousands of prospects via email while keeping bounce/spam rates low. If you manage multiple outbound campaigns (especially across multiple domains or clients), Instantly provides a central hub. It\u2019s also great for experimenting \u2013 you can spin up new sender accounts, try different email copies, and see results quickly. On the flip side, if your prospecting heavily involves calls or LinkedIn, you\u2019d need other tools alongside Instantly (since it won\u2019t help you there). Many growth hackers choose Instantly + another lead source (like Apollo or Snov.io for contacts) + perhaps an AI personalization tool to cover the full workflow. For a lean, email-focused outbound machine, Instantly is a top pick. Recent Updates & Community: In the past year, Instantly has added features like an AI snippet writer and improved their warm-up algorithms (they reacted quickly to changes like Google\u2019s algorithm updates to keep the warm-up effective). The user community (on subreddits like r/EmailMarketing and r/ColdEmail) is quite active \u2013 you\u2019ll find people comparing Instantly to alternatives (e.g., vs. SmartLead or Lemlist). Instantly often comes out favorably in those comparisons for its value and deliverability, though some advanced users juggle multiple tools. One trend is many users moving from older tools like Lemlist to Instantly for the unlimited sending capacity. The company appears to be actively engaging with user feedback (for example, addressing a bug or adding an integration when users ask). However, as the space gets competitive, Instantly is also starting to get more direct competition from similar platforms (some launched in 2023\u201324). Still, it made a strong name for itself in this recent wave of cold email tools. References: Instantly has mixed reviews on Reddit \u2013 e.g., \u201cI really enjoy using Instantly\u2026 finding verified leads is super easy\u201d vs \u201cInstantly is a scam\u2026horrible service\u201d from different users\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. These polarized comments (both in the last year) show that while many find it effective, issues can arise if not set up correctly. On G2, it\u2019s lauded for ease-of-use and support, though some note missing features and cost at scale as minor cons\u200b\nG2.COM\n\u200b\nG2.COM\n. The cold email community (posts circa 2023) often lists Instantly among the top tools for newcomers. (Sources: Reddit r/emailmarketing threads from 2023\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n; G2 reviews summary, Jan 2024\u200b\nG2.COM\n\u200b\nG2.COM\n.) Getting Started: Instantly offers a free plan \u2013 you can \u201cStart for free. No credit card required\u201d on their website\u200b\nINSTANTLY.AI\n. This free tier allows you to connect a couple of email accounts and send a limited number of emails to test it out (at the time of writing, it includes up to 1,000 contacts and 5,000 emails/month according to a 2025 Lemlist review\u200b\nLEMLIST.COM\n). To begin, sign up on Instantly.ai and use the onboarding wizard to connect an email inbox (or create a new dedicated Gmail/Outlook for testing). Try running the built-in Email Warm-up feature for a week to boost your sender reputation. Instantly provides templates for outreach sequences \u2013 you can load one and tweak the copy. They also have an online academy with tips on improving deliverability (worth a read if you\u2019re new). After getting comfortable, upgrade to the Growth plan (~$30/mo) which unlocks unlimited email accounts and higher sending volumes \u2013 this is usually where the real power of Instantly shines for serious outbound campaigns.\n```\n\n### Tool Research Output Example #2\n\n```\nOverview: Reply.io is a sales engagement platform that allows you to automate outreach across multiple channels \u2013 primarily email, but also LinkedIn, calls, SMS, and more \u2013 now with AI assistance baked in. It\u2019s an established player (around since mid-2010s) that has kept evolving, recently adding an AI writing assistant called \u201cJason AI\u201d to help craft and personalize messages. Reply.io can be seen as a lighter-weight alternative to enterprise systems like Outreach.io or Salesloft, giving teams sequence automation, a built-in leads finder, and analytics in one package. In the last year or so, Reply.io has doubled down on AI features, making it quite relevant in the AI prospecting tools landscape. Key Features:\nMultichannel Sequences: You can create automated sequences that include steps like send an email, then wait 2 days, then send a LinkedIn connection, then another email, etc. Reply will handle the sending and even some LinkedIn tasks via integrations. This helps you engage prospects on multiple fronts without manual effort.\nAI SDR \u201cJason\u201d: Reply introduced Jason AI, an AI sales assistant that can generate outreach sequences for you. You input your target buyer and product info, and Jason will suggest email copy or LinkedIn message copy. It can also handle replies in some capacity \u2013 for example, suggesting responses to prospect replies. It\u2019s like having a junior SDR co-pilot that drafts messages and sequences\u200b\nAISDR.COM\n.\nBuilt-in Contact Search: Reply has a database of 140+ million contacts (via partnerships). Through the UI, you can actually search for leads (similar to a mini-Seamless/Apollo). This means you can both find and reach out to leads all inside Reply. The contact data isn\u2019t as exhaustive as dedicated databases, but it\u2019s useful for quickly getting a list without leaving the platform.\nEmail Personalization & Tracking: It supports snippet personalization (merge fields, conditional text) and email A/B testing. Every email sent is tracked for opens, clicks, replies. It also has a handy \u201cEmail Quality Check\u201d that uses AI to warn if your email might sound spammy or if it\u2019s too long, etc.\nCRM Integration: Reply integrates well with CRMs like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive. It can sync contacts and activity, ensuring your CRM has the updated info on sends and replies. It also has a two-way sync to avoid duplicating effort (e.g., if someone replies, mark them appropriately in CRM).\nTeam Collaboration & Analytics: Managers can see team performance, best-performing sequences, etc. It\u2019s good for SDR teams working together, sharing templates and results. The analytics help optimize campaigns over time.\nPros: Feature-rich and unified \u2013 users appreciate that Reply.io can be a one-stop shop for outreach. Instead of using separate tools for email, LinkedIn automation, and phone task reminders, Reply covers many in one. Reviews often highlight its ease of setup for sequences and the slick sequencing interface. One Reddit user in r/coldemail called Reply.io \u201ca game-changer for my outreach \u2013 the AI writing assistant and multichannel sequences are pretty slick.\u201d\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n That sentiment of slick AI assistance is echoed by others who have tried the new Jason AI. It helps craft messages that feel more 1-to-1; some say Reply\u2019s AI-generated emails are less generic than other tools they tried\u200b\nG2.COM\n. Another pro is deliverability controls \u2013 Reply has features like automatic pause if too many emails bounce, and it supports email warm-up via integrations. Users also like the built-in lead search as a convenient way to top-up their contact list without an external database (especially useful for SMBs who can\u2019t afford a big data subscription). Customer sentiment in reviews (G2, Capterra) is generally positive, citing good customer support and continuous improvements. It\u2019s seen as a robust platform that \u201chas everything I need in one place\u201d\u200b\nG2.COM\n, which for a busy sales rep means less tool-switching. The pricing is moderate for the value provided (it\u2019s typically cheaper than Outreach.io and others, and you\u2019re not paying separately for an AI email writer or a data tool, since they\u2019re included). Cons: Complexity and UI quirks: Because Reply.io does a lot, some users find the interface a bit overwhelming or not as polished in certain areas. A user review titled \u201ca mixed bag\u201d noted that while powerful, it took time to learn all the features and they encountered some bugs in the LinkedIn sending workflow (Reddit, ~8 mo ago). The LinkedIn automation is a newer aspect and may require using Reply\u2019s Chrome extension \u2013 it\u2019s not as seamless as dedicated LinkedIn tools (and LinkedIn can always change things to break it). Another con is that Reply\u2019s contact data quality (for the built-in database) is not on par with specialist tools \u2013 think of it as a bonus, not the main reason to buy. For serious list building, you might still use a dedicated tool. Also, some competitors like SmartLead have pushed ahead on certain features (e.g., more advanced email sending algorithms or team collaboration features) \u2013 so a savvy user might find a specific niche tool better in one dimension. A practical complaint: Reply charges per user seat and per contact credits; if you have a growing team, costs can rise, and some features are in higher-tier plans. In community discussions, a few people mentioned they preferred separate best-of-breed tools (like a specialized LinkedIn tool + email tool) rather than an all-in-one like Reply, citing that dedicated tools can have deeper functionality in their area. Lastly, deliverability is ultimately on the user\u2019s setup \u2013 a couple of users said they saw lower open rates on Reply than on simpler tools, though this is anecdotal and could be due to many factors (one Reddit post wondered if Reply\u2019s sending IPs or tracking domains affected open rates, when comparing Apollo vs Reply)\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. There\u2019s no clear evidence of Reply causing deliverability issues, but as with any platform, careful setup (custom domains, proper warm-up) is needed. Best Fit Use Cases: Sales teams that want a cohesive outreach system will benefit from Reply.io. If you are an SDR or AE who needs to run cadences that touch prospects via multiple channels, Reply provides that orchestration. It\u2019s great for B2B teams where email + LinkedIn together greatly increase contact rates. For example, an SDR can have Reply send emails and also remind them (or automate) to send a LinkedIn message or dial a number as part of the same sequence. It\u2019s also well-suited for teams that have moved beyond basic cold emailing and are looking to scale up \u2013 perhaps you started with just Gmail + mail merge, and now you need better tracking, more structure, and some AI help \u2013 Reply is a logical next step. Also, organizations that lack content support can use Jason AI to help reps write better outreach copy (useful for consistency and saving time). If you already have enterprise-grade solutions, Reply might overlap, but for many SMB and mid-market companies, it hits a sweet spot of functionality vs. cost. Keep in mind, if your outreach is solely email and you never plan to do calls or LinkedIn, you might not need all of Reply\u2019s bells and whistles (a leaner email-only tool could suffice). But many find that having multichannel capabilities ready to go encourages a more effective outreach strategy. Recent Updates & Community: In the past year, AI in outreach has been the trend, and Reply.io rode that wave by launching Jason AI and other GPT-3/4 powered features (like their email assistant which was highlighted in marketing around early 2024). They also introduced a new interface for sequence building and more granular analytics. The user community (particularly on Reddit\u2019s r/sales and r/coldemail) frequently includes Reply.io in \u201cwhich tool should I use\u201d discussions. It\u2019s often recommended by users who emphasize multichannel outreach. There\u2019s recognition that Reply has kept up with times \u2013 one comment in late 2024 noted that \u201cReply.io is top tier as well,\u201d putting it in the same breath as Lemlist and others known for deliverability\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Trends: Many tools are adding AI writers, but not all have integrated into the workflow as nicely as Reply (since they built Jason AI to sit within the sequence creation). Another trend is consolidation of tools \u2013 some companies want fewer software vendors, and having contact search + dialer + email in one (like Reply) aligns with that, which could be why it\u2019s gaining adoption. On the flip side, some power-users on Hacker News or GrowthHackers still favor API-driven or highly customized stacks, but that\u2019s a minority. The general trajectory is that Reply.io has remained very relevant by innovating and listening to SDR needs. References: A Reddit user review (Q1 2024) mentioned Reply.io\u2019s AI agent \u201cJason\u201d finding high-value prospects and handling responses, calling it like having a buddy SDR\u200b\nAISDR.COM\n. On G2, Reply.io holds around a 4.6/5 rating; pros often listed include the multichannel sequencing and ease of use, while cons include wanting deeper LinkedIn integration or minor UI improvements (G2 reviews, mid-2024)\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Another Reddit thread comparing cold email platforms noted \u201cReply.io is top tier as well\u201d when discussing deliverability and usability (reddit user in r/EmailMarketing, 2023)\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Overall, community feedback in the last year paints Reply as a reliable, ever-improving tool with a strong feature set. (Sources: Reddit threads in r/coldemail and r/sales 2023\u201324; G2 user reviews 2024; Reply.io official announcements.) Getting Started: Reply.io offers a 14-day free trial (no credit card required). That\u2019s the best way to get hands-on. During the trial, you have access to most features, including Jason AI. Start by using the Email Assistant or Jason AI to generate a sample outreach sequence: you\u2019ll be prompted to input your offering and target persona, and the AI will draft a multi-touch sequence for you \u2013 it\u2019s quite an insightful experience to see what it comes up with. You can edit those drafts to add your personal flair. Next, if you have some contacts, upload a small list (or use the Reply contact search to find a few leads in your niche) to test the sequence. Try sending to just 5-10 contacts initially and monitor the opens/replies in Reply\u2019s dashboard. Also explore creating a sequence that includes a LinkedIn task \u2013 e.g., \u201cDay 3: send LinkedIn connection request\u201d \u2013 to see how Reply guides you or automates it. This will give you a feel for the multichannel capability. When ready to commit, choose a plan based on your team size. The Starter plan (around $60/user/month, annually) is good for a single user with moderate outreach needs. For teams, the Professional or Custom plans might be needed, especially if you want the dialing feature or more contact credits. Make sure to set up your email sending domain properly (SPF, DKIM) \u2013 Reply has a setup wizard for that. They also have good onboarding support and a knowledge base if you hit any snags. In short: use the trial to build a dummy sequence with AI help, send a few test emails, and you\u2019ll quickly see how Reply can fit into your sales process.\n```\n\n### Tool Research Output Example #3\n\n```\nOverview: Seamless.AI is a popular tool for building lead lists, known as an affordable alternative to giants like ZoomInfo. It is essentially an AI-powered sales intelligence platform that finds business contacts (emails, phone numbers, etc.) at scale. Seamless provides a massive database of professionals and companies, accessible via a web app or Chrome extension that you can use on LinkedIn. The \u201cAI\u201d in Seamless largely refers to their search algorithms that attempt to find direct dials and emails for prospects in real time, as well as features that recommend prospects similar to your targets. Over the last 12\u201318 months, Seamless.AI has been widely adopted by sales teams looking to quickly fill their pipeline without the exorbitant cost of legacy data providers. Key Features:\nMassive Contact Database: Seamless claims to index hundreds of millions of contacts. You can search by title, company, industry, etc., and get phone numbers and emails. It also offers company info like revenue, employee count, tech stack indicators, etc.\nReal-Time Search with AI: Instead of static lists, Seamless uses AI to crawl the web and validate info on the fly. For example, when you search for a person, it might pull data from LinkedIn, company websites, and other sources in real time to provide up-to-date contact info.\nChrome Extension: A key workflow is using Seamless on LinkedIn/Sales Navigator \u2013 as you view a profile or a list of people, the extension can find their email/phone with one click. This is very handy for prospecting directly from LinkedIn.\nCRM Integration & Export: You can export found leads directly into CRM or into CSV files. Seamless integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, etc., to push leads and even log activities.\nAI Sales Assistant (Announcements): Seamless has marketed some newer AI features, like an assistant that can generate a first draft outreach message or research talking points about a prospect. However, user focus is primarily on the contact data itself.\nCommunity and Training Content: The company is known for aggressive marketing (the CEO posts a lot on LinkedIn). They provide training videos and even daily \u201cList Building\u201d tips. They also gamified the platform (leaderboards for most leads found, etc.).\nPros: Huge volume of leads at a lower cost is the top selling point. Users like that Seamless offers unlimited searches (in practice, it\u2019s a high cap) for a flat subscription, whereas many data providers charge per contact or have strict limits. Many small-to-mid businesses found they could finally afford a decent contact database with Seamless. As one user noted, \u201cthe quality of phone numbers and reach percentage are excellent compared to other tools\u201d\u200b\nONSAAS.ME\n \u2013 indicating that for certain data (like direct dials), Seamless gave better results than competitors in their experience. It\u2019s also relatively easy to use: search filters are straightforward and the Chrome extension means you don\u2019t have to leave LinkedIn to get contact info. For building big lists quickly (say you need 500 new prospects for a campaign by tomorrow), Seamless is very efficient. It also got some recognition: it was featured as a leader in G2\u2019s Winter 2025 Grid and has a solid rating (users often mention 4.6+/5 on review sites). Another pro is constant updates \u2013 Seamless\u2019s team frequently refreshes the data and adds new features. The platform\u2019s AI recommendations can surface lookalike prospects (find others similar to your best customer profile), which can help newcomers who aren\u2019t sure where to start. Cons: The biggest complaints about Seamless.AI are data accuracy and aggressive sales tactics of the company itself. It\u2019s almost a meme in some sales forums that Seamless\u2019s own sales reps are overly persistent (ironically so for a prospecting company). One Reddit thread titled \u201cF**k Seamless.ai\u201d had a user ranting: \u201cTheir software is decent, their business dealing is atrocious. Aggressive sales, high price\u2026\u201d\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Users have reported being signed up to auto-renewing contracts or getting hounded by Seamless reps. So, caution on the buying process \u2013 read the fine print and be ready for upsell calls. On data quality: while Seamless can find a lot, email accuracy can be hit or miss. Some users note many emails come back \u201cunverified\u201d or outdated. For example, one person found that about 50% of emails were unverified in a batch\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n, leading them to question if Seamless was worth it. The phone number accuracy tends to be a bit better (especially direct dials when available), but you\u2019ll still get some wrong numbers. Essentially, Seamless might require additional email verification steps to avoid bounces. Another con: LinkedIn has cracked down on some data scraping tools; a few months ago Seamless\u2019s LinkedIn pages/extensions faced issues (rumor was LinkedIn temporarily restricted them)\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. This caused concern about the extension\u2019s stability, though it appears to be working now. Finally, support can be slow unless you\u2019re on an enterprise plan \u2013 some small team users complained that it was hard to get issues resolved quickly. Best Fit Use Cases: Seamless.AI is best for teams that need large quantities of B2B contacts quickly \u2013 for example, SDR teams doing high-volume outbound, or marketers building big email lists for campaigns. It\u2019s particularly useful if you don\u2019t have an existing database; Seamless can jump-start your prospect list building without a six-figure ZoomInfo contract. It\u2019s also good for sales orgs that have a handle on outreach but just need \u201cmore leads\u201d at the top of funnel. If you combine Seamless with an email tool (like Instantly or Reply.io) and perhaps LinkedIn outreach, you have a full outbound engine. However, if extremely high accuracy is required (say you\u2019re only emailing a dozen VIP accounts and need perfect data), Seamless might not be the go-to \u2013 a more curated approach or LinkedIn InMail might be better there. Also, very small businesses on a tight budget should be mindful: although cheaper than big competitors, Seamless is not \u201ccheap\u201d \u2013 annual plans can cost a few thousand dollars. It yields a lot of data for that price, but only invest if you have the bandwidth to actually use that data (i.e., you plan to reach out to thousands of contacts and thus benefit from unlimited search). Recent Updates & Community: Seamless has been aggressively updating features, including adding AI elements like a pitch writing tool and deeper integration with CRMs. In late 2024, they announced funding and an expanding database. The user community (r/sales, r/LeadGeneration, etc.) is vocal: many new SDRs ask if Seamless is worth it, and answers are mixed. A repeated insight is: Seamless is valuable, but verify the data. Trend-wise, some users compare Apollo.io vs Seamless vs ZoomInfo \u2013 often Apollo (another competitor) wins on price for startups (Apollo has a free tier), Seamless wins on unlimited search, ZoomInfo wins on sheer data quality but at a high price. Another trend is LinkedIn continually tightening access \u2013 so tools like Seamless walk a fine line to maintain functionality. Seamless\u2019s community presence is also seen in their marketing \u201chype\u201d (some find it too hyped). Importantly, in mid-2023 there was buzz about Seamless and Apollo\u2019s LinkedIn extensions possibly causing LinkedIn account flags\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. Many sellers now use these tools a bit more cautiously (e.g., staying within daily search limits, etc.). Overall, Seamless remains a top-of-mind tool in prospecting discussions, for better or worse. References: On Reddit\u2019s r/sales (2023), multiple threads discuss Seamless: one user bluntly stated \u201cI would never recommend Seamless.ai as a company\u201d due to the aggressive sales tactics\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n, whereas others acknowledge the tool\u2019s utility but warn to \u201ccheck how reliable the info is\u201d\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. G2 reviews (as of early 2024) give Seamless around 4.2\u20134.5 stars, often citing the richness of contacts but noting data can be stale. A comparison on r/sales between ZoomInfo, Apollo, and Seamless had folks noting Seamless is great for quantity, ZoomInfo for quality\u200b\nREDDIT.COM\n. (Sources: Reddit r/sales threads, Sept 2023; r/Emailmarketing thread 6 mo. ago; G2 and Capterra reviews 2024.) Getting Started: Seamless.AI typically offers a free trial or free demo credits\u200b\nONSAAS.ME\n. You can start by signing up on their website for a limited free version \u2013 often you get e.g. 50 credits to test. Use these to search for a handful of your target prospects and evaluate the results. If you like what you see, the next step is their basic paid plan (monthly or annual). Be aware Seamless usually pushes annual contracts for better pricing. If you\u2019re unsure, try to get a monthly option or a pilot. When you do subscribe, make sure to turn off auto-renew if you don\u2019t want to be locked in (you may need to talk to support for this; reading the contract is key). Technically, onboarding is simple: use the Chrome extension on LinkedIn to start pulling contacts, and watch some of Seamless\u2019s tutorial videos on how to refine searches. A tip: Always run the emails you get through an email verifier (Seamless has one built-in, but a second check with a tool like NeverBounce can help) before sending huge campaigns. This will filter out bad addresses and protect your sender reputation. Given Seamless\u2019s scale, it\u2019s easy to go overboard \u2013 start with smaller lists, verify, then expand. In summary, leverage the free trial to gauge if the data fits your needs, then proceed with a paid plan while keeping an eye on data quality.\n```\n\n---\n## {{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }} Tool List JSON\n\nYou have a single, definitive list of tools (in JSON format) to evaluate:\n\n- This list is the only source you may use when choosing or discussing tools. If this list is empty or not provided, you must then look to the attached JSON file instead.\n- When recommending or discussing the top 6\u20138 tools, you must choose from the list below.\n- Do not include or create any new tools.\n- If a tool is not in the list above, do not bring it up.\n- You must not reference or propose any tool that does not appear in the JSON array.\n- That means no external or \u201cinvented\u201d solutions.\n- Violating this rule would mean failing the instructions.\n\nYou must get this correct. Mistakes here are unacceptable.\n\n```\n{{ JSON.stringify($('set_category_tools').item.json.category_tools, null, 2) }}\n```",
"type": "string"
}
]
},
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.set",
"typeVersion": 3.4,
"position": [
1000,
0
],
"id": "29dbd860-9b94-4cbb-bdc7-4ed2dabc3ec2",
"name": "build_deep_research_prompt"
},
{
"parameters": {
"authentication": "oAuth2",
"operation": "sendAndWait",
"select": "channel",
"channelId": {
"__rl": true,
"value": "C08KC39K8DR",
"mode": "list",
"cachedResultName": "ai-tools-content"
},
"message": "=I have put together a Deep Research prompt for the *Best {{ $('fetch_category').item.json.title }}* article please run this prompt using Deep Research then click *Add Result* to continue.\n\nPrompt:\n`{{ $json.permalink }}`\n\nTools JSON:\n`{{ $('upload_tools_json_file').item.json.permalink }}`",
"responseType": "customForm",
"formFields": {
"values": [
{
"fieldLabel": "Deep Research Result",
"fieldType": "textarea",
"placeholder": "Paste the entire Deep Research result into here.",
"requiredField": true
}
]
},
"options": {
"messageButtonLabel": "Add Result"
}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.slack",
"typeVersion": 2.3,
"position": [
1700,
0
],
"id": "e6f33e1f-6b16-48e9-95bb-aaf983f26981",
"name": "share_research_prompt_and_wait",
"credentials": {
"slackOAuth2Api": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
}
},
{
"parameters": {
"operation": "toText",
"sourceProperty": "deep_research_prompt",
"options": {}
},
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.convertToFile",
"typeVersion": 1.1,
"position": [
1240,
0
],
"id": "3e6006a3-1a38-4966-8798-7a2abebb5fe3",
"name": "create_prompt_file"
},
{
"par
Credentials you'll need
Each integration node will prompt for credentials when you import. We strip credential IDs before publishing — you'll add your own.
anthropicApigooglePalmApihttpHeaderAuthopenAiApislackOAuth2Api
Pro
For the full experience including quality scoring and batch install features for each workflow upgrade to Pro
About this workflow
Content - Write Best Tools In Category Article. Uses formTrigger, httpRequest, slack, chainLlm. Event-driven trigger; 41 nodes.
Source: https://github.com/VasilisPlavos/Learn/blob/906c45384956c575c32f82e5baef5b2f4bfcc9bb/automations/n8n/lucaswalter-n8n-ai-automations/write_seo_optimized_listicle_article.json — original creator credit. Request a take-down →
Related workflows
Workflows that share integrations, category, or trigger type with this one. All free to copy and import.
Content - Newsletter Agent. Uses formTrigger, chainLlm, outputParserStructured, httpRequest. Event-driven trigger; 87 nodes.
Form Trigger, Chain Llm, Output Parser Structured +7
This template attempts to replicate OpenAI's DeepResearch feature which, at time of writing, is only available to their pro subscribers.
Output Parser Structured, OpenAI Chat, Form Trigger +8
My workflow 53. Uses formTrigger, httpRequest, lmChatOpenAi, form. Event-driven trigger; 74 nodes.
Form Trigger, HTTP Request, OpenAI Chat +15
Episode 23: UGC with nanobanana. Uses lmChatOpenAi, lmChatOllama, lmChatDeepSeek, lmChatOpenRouter. Event-driven trigger; 74 nodes.
OpenAI Chat, Ollama Chat, Lm Chat Deep Seek +12
Many new n8n users struggle with testing webhooks when running n8n on localhost, as external services cannot reach . This workflow introduces a technique using PostBin, which provides a temporary, pub
HTTP Request, Post Bin, Debug Helper +6