AiAgent This workflow corresponds to n8n.io template #6042 — we link there as the canonical source.
This workflow follows the Agent → Chat Trigger recipe pattern — see all workflows that pair these two integrations.
The workflow JSON
Copy or download the full n8n JSON below. Paste it into a new n8n workflow, add your credentials, activate. Full import guide →
{
"id": "ZQOaEe4Th7t9QSFu",
"meta": {
"templateCredsSetupCompleted": true
},
"name": "AI-Powered Online Tool Finder Utilizing GPT-4o and SerpAPI",
"tags": [],
"nodes": [
{
"id": "804eae08-ed38-4f59-8dfb-6bebf4a78e8b",
"name": "When chat message received",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.chatTrigger",
"position": [
-240,
80
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"typeVersion": 1.1
},
{
"id": "f9967b15-67f5-4d58-9190-180a82997b40",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
60,
320
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "8faa04e9-ce12-49f8-951f-3235d3576ecc",
"name": "Window Buffer Memory1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.memoryBufferWindow",
"position": [
200,
320
],
"parameters": {},
"typeVersion": 1.3
},
{
"id": "4799d172-cda2-462b-94b2-d544a8acbe6e",
"name": "SerpAPI1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
320,
320
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "4d6da77f-07cd-40fc-9b8e-1fc3e32b4831",
"name": "Structured Output Parser",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.outputParserStructured",
"position": [
460,
320
],
"parameters": {
"jsonSchemaExample": " {\n \"topic\":\"USER_INPUT_TOPIC\",\n \"ItemNames\": [\n \"Item_1\",\n \"Item_2\",\n \"Item_3\",\n \"Item_4\",\n \"Item_5\"\n ]\n }"
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"name": "Merge1",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.merge",
"position": [
1840,
40
],
"parameters": {
"numberInputs": 5
},
"typeVersion": 3
},
{
"id": "092d819e-a96c-47ae-8002-97f47beeca59",
"name": "Aggregate1",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.aggregate",
"position": [
2080,
80
],
"parameters": {
"options": {},
"fieldsToAggregate": {
"fieldToAggregate": [
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 1",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 2",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 3",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 4",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 5",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
}
]
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "8d126a26-f902-4c62-b85b-07fa1e158e2b",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
2300,
260
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o-mini"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "23fdc7b4-5247-4e86-a3b7-f887d0c63c76",
"name": "SerpAPI",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
-380
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "95bb4b5f-0b07-4910-b941-bd70158a1c2b",
"name": "SerpAPI3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
260
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "5ece162d-1eef-48aa-9c36-f902765596a8",
"name": "SerpAPI4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
620
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "aad193d4-447d-4a4e-aa64-11b0cb517171",
"name": "SerpAPI5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
980
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "e5b22323-aa70-4a46-be43-0981f5b043a1",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
-380
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "bf7ac647-f8b0-43a1-adaa-e65a5d5eaab6",
"name": "SerpAPI2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
-60
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "27badea6-7a4d-4c22-990c-8d5f5b0c4d72",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
-60
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "f8a34202-1eae-4c25-b487-7e374e52b942",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
260
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "dd164dae-8506-49d5-bc2c-2c3766963518",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
620
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "5ea4bb0d-9305-40c1-9d1f-7f3b9de8c66c",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model6",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1060,
960
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"name": "<your credential>"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1",
"name": "Reviewer 1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1100,
-560
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[0] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. \u00a0You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. \u00a0These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[0] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n\u00a0\nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number\u00a0of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only\u2014no one\u2011time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14\u2011day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single\u2011trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization\u2014image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular \u201cif\u2013then\u201d logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your \u201cFrom\u201d address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price\u2011performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi\u2011channel features; extensive integrations (5,500\u20137,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4\u20135/5 on ease\u2011of\u2011use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user\u2011friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time\u2011saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3\u20139 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct\u00a02024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease\u2011of\u2011use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--\u201cConstant Contact is simply a bad product\u2026 way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]\u201d. \n--\u201cTakes FOREVER\u2026 crashes nonstop\u2026 HOGS my CPU\u201d.\n--Also reports of \u201cdifficult cancellation\u201d and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5\u2014strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3\u20134)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92\u201397%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K\u20137K+ apps), including CRM, e\u2011commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2\u20133)\n-Automation is basic\u2014limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features\u2014value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations\u2014template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom\u2014and want maximum value\u2014it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns.\n\n\n"
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e",
"name": "Reviewer 2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1100,
-240
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[1] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. \u00a0You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. \u00a0These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[1] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n\u00a0\nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number\u00a0of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only\u2014no one\u2011time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14\u2011day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single\u2011trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization\u2014image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular \u201cif\u2013then\u201d logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your \u201cFrom\u201d address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price\u2011performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi\u2011channel features; extensive integrations (5,500\u20137,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4\u20135/5 on ease\u2011of\u2011use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user\u2011friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time\u2011saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3\u20139 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct\u00a02024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease\u2011of\u2011use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--\u201cConstant Contact is simply a bad product\u2026 way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]\u201d. \n--\u201cTakes FOREVER\u2026 crashes nonstop\u2026 HOGS my CPU\u201d.\n--Also reports of \u201cdifficult cancellation\u201d and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5\u2014strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3\u20134)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92\u201397%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K\u20137K+ apps), including CRM, e\u2011commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2\u20133)\n-Automation is basic\u2014limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features\u2014value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations\u2014template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom\u2014and want maximum value\u2014it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7",
"name": "Reviewer 3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[2] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. \u00a0You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. \u00a0These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[2] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n\u00a0\nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number\u00a0of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only\u2014no one\u2011time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14\u2011day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single\u2011trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization\u2014image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular \u201cif\u2013then\u201d logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your \u201cFrom\u201d address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price\u2011performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi\u2011channel features; extensive integrations (5,500\u20137,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4\u20135/5 on ease\u2011of\u2011use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user\u2011friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time\u2011saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3\u20139 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct\u00a02024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease\u2011of\u2011use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--\u201cConstant Contact is simply a bad product\u2026 way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]\u201d. \n--\u201cTakes FOREVER\u2026 crashes nonstop\u2026 HOGS my CPU\u201d.\n--Also reports of \u201cdifficult cancellation\u201d and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5\u2014strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3\u20134)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92\u201397%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K\u20137K+ apps), including CRM, e\u2011commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2\u20133)\n-Automation is basic\u2014limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features\u2014value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations\u2014template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom\u2014and want maximum value\u2014it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074",
"name": "Reviewer 4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
420
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[3] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. \u00a0You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. \u00a0These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[3] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n\u00a0\nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number\u00a0of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only\u2014no one\u2011time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14\u2011day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single\u2011trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization\u2014image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular \u201cif\u2013then\u201d logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your \u201cFrom\u201d address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price\u2011performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi\u2011channel features; extensive integrations (5,500\u20137,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4\u20135/5 on ease\u2011of\u2011use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user\u2011friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time\u2011saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3\u20139 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct\u00a02024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease\u2011of\u2011use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--\u201cConstant Contact is simply a bad product\u2026 way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]\u201d. \n--\u201cTakes FOREVER\u2026 crashes nonstop\u2026 HOGS my CPU\u201d.\n--Also reports of \u201cdifficult cancellation\u201d and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5\u2014strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3\u20134)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92\u201397%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K\u20137K+ apps), including CRM, e\u2011commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2\u20133)\n-Automation is basic\u2014limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features\u2014value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations\u2014template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom\u2014and want maximum value\u2014it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b",
"name": "Reviewer 5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
780
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[4] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. \u00a0You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. \u00a0These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[4] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n\u00a0\nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number\u00a0of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only\u2014no one\u2011time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14\u2011day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single\u2011trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization\u2014image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular \u201cif\u2013then\u201d logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your \u201cFrom\u201d address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price\u2011performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi\u2011channel features; extensive integrations (5,500\u20137,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4\u20135/5 on ease\u2011of\u2011use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user\u2011friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time\u2011saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3\u20139 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct\u00a02024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease\u2011of\u2011use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--\u201cConstant Contact is simply a bad product\u2026 way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]\u201d. \n--\u201cTakes FOREVER\u2026 crashes nonstop\u2026 HOGS my CPU\u201d.\n--Also reports of \u201cdifficult cancellation\u201d and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5\u2014strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3\u20134)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92\u201397%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K\u20137K+ apps), including CRM, e\u2011commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2\u20133)\n-Automation is basic\u2014limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features\u2014value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations\u2014template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom\u2014and want maximum value\u2014it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "419cd0fd-d130-4060-bfd7-5a588cc1f22e",
"name": "Compiler",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
2360,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json['Output 1'][0] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][1] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][2] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][3] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][4] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "Role: \nYou are an organizing agent. You are to take the data and present it as 5 separate groups. One for each item. You are to combine it in a clean and efficient way. You are great at this and will make it look almost like a pamphlet. It is to be a list of items that a person is comparing in order to purchase an item from.\n\n\n\nConstraints: \nDo not change any of the original information, you can only reorganize it and present it in a clean fashion.\n"
},
"promptType": "define",
"hasOutputParser": true
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "cf248523-643e-40cb-8b2a-f59be732527e",
"name": "Sticky Note",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote",
"position": [
-260,
-780
],
"parameters": {
"color": 5,
"width": 920,
"height": 680,
"content": "Create an Open AI key:\n-Create an Open AI account. \n-Go to platform.openai.com/api-keysAfter creating an account, click on your name in the top right corner. \n-Click on your profile.\n-On the left side click on API keys.\n-Create a new secret key.\n-Give it a name (optional).\n-Create secret key and copy.\n-Open the n8n workflow.\n-Right click and open the first OpenAI chat model under Item finder tools Agent.\n-Click under credential to connect with and click create new credential.\n-Paste copied API Key in this position in n8n.\n-Use the same API key to open and connect with the OpenAI chat model for the Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2, Reviewer 3, Reviewer 4, Reviewer 5, and Compiler Tools Agents.\n-IMPORTANT: This workflow uses GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini. This cost ~$0.06 per run. You must put money, recommend no more than $5, into your open ai account.\n-Click on your profile again. On left hand side click on billing. Add credit to balance.\n\n-Create SerpiApi account at https://serpapi.com/users/sign_up\n -After account creation, click on API key and copy it.\n -Right click open on serp API under the Item finder tools agent.\n -Click on credential to connect with.\n -Copy in API key.\n -Repeat the above 3 steps for Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2, Reviewer 3, Reviewer 4, and Reviewer 5 tools agent.\n -TIP: This workflow uses ~8-15 of the 100 free monthly SerpAPI searches. If you utilize more than 100 searches in a month you can create a new SerpAPI account and connect another API key to the tools agents.\n\n\n\n\nHow to use:\nIn the bottom, click on the open chat box. Type in the software item/tool you are trying to find. The workflow will automatically initiate. When it has completed you will see text on the right hand side under latest logs from the Compiler node. Scroll down until you see output. This is your information. I recommend copy and pasting it to a word document for ease of access at a later date. You can always find prior searches by clicking on executions at the top. You then right click and open the Compiler tools agent. Clicking on logs at the top and you will see the output information again. "
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"name": "Tool Finder",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
200,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.chatInput }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=Role:\nYou are an expert in finding the best online services to complete a job and you always find the best options. You will receive a text prompt. This text prompt is \u00a0{{ $json.chatInput }}. \u00a0This text prompt will be a task that the user would like completed. Your goal is to find 5 online options of how that task can be completed. You will conduct a search with google search (SERPAPI) tool. Your query to google search (SERPAPI) tool should be things like \"Best options to {{ $json.chatInput }}\", \"Top end ways to {{ $json.chatInput }}\", or \"top rated services for {{ $json.chatInput }}\".\n\nCommand: With this search you will create a list of the 5 online tools or companies that provide the desired service. You should include the text prompt in your list at the end of the tool as you will be passing this information onto another agent who will need to know what the tool is utilized for. You will only provide the names of these companies or tools. You should preferentially choose tools or services that have the highest rating.\n\nConstraints:\nAvoid any repeat tools or services.\nYou must provide 5 tools or services. You cannot proceed with less than 5 items.\n\n\nFormat:\nExample output\nItem prompt: automatically respond to emails\n\n1. Constant Contact to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n2. Brevo to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n3. Klaviyo to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n4. Campaigner to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n5. Hubspot to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n \n\n\n"
},
"promptType": "define",
"hasOutputParser": true
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
}
],
"active": false,
"settings": {
"executionOrder": "v1"
},
"versionId": "39163d50-7156-44c3-965d-b2c72b6411ff",
"connections": {
"Merge1": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Aggregate1",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"SerpAPI": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 1",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Compiler": {
"main": [
[]
]
},
"SerpAPI1": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Tool Finder",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"SerpAPI2": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 2",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"SerpAPI3": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 3",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"SerpAPI4": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 4",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"SerpAPI5": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 5",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Aggregate1": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Compiler",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Reviewer 1": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Merge1",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Reviewer 2": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Merge1",
"type": "main",
"index": 1
}
]
]
},
"Reviewer 3": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Merge1",
"type": "main",
"index": 2
}
]
]
},
"Reviewer 4": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Merge1",
"type": "main",
"index": 3
}
]
]
},
"Reviewer 5": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Merge1",
"type": "main",
"index": 4
}
]
]
},
"Tool Finder": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 1",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "Reviewer 2",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "Reviewer 3",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "Reviewer 4",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "Reviewer 5",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Compiler",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model1": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Tool Finder",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model2": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 1",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model3": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 2",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model4": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 3",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model5": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 4",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"OpenAI Chat Model6": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "Reviewer 5",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Window Buffer Memory1": {
"ai_memory": [
[
{
"node": "Tool Finder",
"type": "ai_memory",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"Structured Output Parser": {
"ai_outputParser": [
[
{
"node": "Tool Finder",
"type": "ai_outputParser",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"When chat message received": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "Tool Finder",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
}
}
}
Credentials you'll need
Each integration node will prompt for credentials when you import. We strip credential IDs before publishing — you'll add your own.
openAiApiserpApi
Pro
For the full experience including quality scoring and batch install features for each workflow upgrade to Pro
About this workflow
This powerful workflow can take hours of difficult research attempting to identify the perfect online tool to aid you with your business and condenses it into a few short seconds. Simply typing the name of an online tool you would like to identify into a chat message will…
Source: https://n8n.io/workflows/6042/ — original creator credit. Request a take-down →
Related workflows
Workflows that share integrations, category, or trigger type with this one. All free to copy and import.
This powerful workflow can take hours of difficult research attempting to identify the perfect product to buy and condense it into a few short minutes. Simply typing the name of an item you wish to pu
Chat Trigger, OpenAI Chat, Memory Buffer Window +3
Generate high-quality, SEO-optimized content briefs automatically using AI, real-time keyword research, SERP intelligence, and historical content context. This workflow standardizes user inputs, fetch
Memory Buffer Window, Agent, Output Parser Structured +6
HDW Lead Geländewagen. Uses chatTrigger, lmChatOpenAi, memoryBufferWindow, outputParserStructured. Chat trigger; 92 nodes.
Chat Trigger, OpenAI Chat, Memory Buffer Window +5
by Varritech Technologies
Chat Trigger, Agent, OpenAI Chat +8
Who is this workflow for? This workflow is designed for SEO analysts, content creators, marketing agencies, and developers who need to index a website and then interact with its content as if it were
Agent, OpenAI Chat, Memory Buffer Window +10